On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:51:27 -0400, "Christopher W. Curtis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A poor man's version would be: "man dpkg-scanpackages"
apt-ftparchive does a better job than dpkg-scanpackages.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !!
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:51:27 -0400, "Christopher W. Curtis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A poor man's version would be: "man dpkg-scanpackages"
apt-ftparchive does a better job than dpkg-scanpackages.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !!
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:40:27PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> Eric Winger (2003-08-20 16:05:33 -0700) :
>
> > So, two questions:
> >
> > * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> > seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
>
> It's the best way I've found.
>
> > * I
Christopher W. Curtis wrote:
A quick google for "apt repository howto", besides pulling up a
surprising number of links about RPMs, also brings up these two:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/repository-howto/repository-howto.html
Thanks to everyone for their responses. This link has prove
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:40:27PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> Eric Winger (2003-08-20 16:05:33 -0700) :
>
> > So, two questions:
> >
> > * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> > seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
>
> It's the best way I've found.
>
> > * I
Christopher W. Curtis wrote:
A quick google for "apt repository howto", besides pulling up a
surprising number of links about RPMs, also brings up these two:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/repository-howto/repository-howto.html
Thanks to everyone for their responses. This link has proved ver
Eric Winger (2003-08-20 16:05:33 -0700) :
> So, two questions:
>
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
It's the best way I've found.
> * If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
> building/mainta
Eric Winger (2003-08-20 16:05:33 -0700) :
> So, two questions:
>
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
It's the best way I've found.
> * If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
> building/mainta
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, two questions:
>
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
Its realy easy for small repositories (say <100 packages so this
applies to you) but you need proper management script
Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, two questions:
>
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
Its realy easy for small repositories (say <100 packages so this
applies to you) but you need proper management script
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:05:33PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
It seems a reasonable way to have some packages that are specific for
your situation.
> * If this is the most reasonable
On 08/20/03 19:05, Eric Winger wrote:
> Continuing our investigation into debian packages, we'd like to be able
> to create our own internal archive/repository for just our packages.
...
> I don't see much information on what an archive is, how one
> creates/administers one, how one puts packages
Eric Winger wrote:
> So, two questions:
>
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
Yes.
> * If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
> building/maintaining your own archive.
You need to create a rep
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:05:33PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
It seems a reasonable way to have some packages that are specific for
your situation.
> * If this is the most reasonable
On 08/20/03 19:05, Eric Winger wrote:
> Continuing our investigation into debian packages, we'd like to be able
> to create our own internal archive/repository for just our packages.
...
> I don't see much information on what an archive is, how one
> creates/administers one, how one puts packages
Eric Winger wrote:
> So, two questions:
>
> * Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
> seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
Yes.
> * If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
> building/maintaining your own archive.
You need to create a rep
16 matches
Mail list logo
