On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 07:40:56PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20030213T213418+, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > The only drawback I can see is changes in the packaging between
> > releases leads to a whole new src tarball to upload to the archive
> > rather than just a new diff, but
On 20030213T213418+, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> The only drawback I can see is changes in
> the packaging between releases leads to a whole new src tarball to
> upload to the archive rather than just a new diff, but hopefully this
> shouldn't happen too often.
I once did this, and usually I le
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 07:40:56PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20030213T213418+, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > The only drawback I can see is changes in the packaging between
> > releases leads to a whole new src tarball to upload to the archive
> > rather than just a new diff, but
On 20030213T213418+, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> The only drawback I can see is changes in
> the packaging between releases leads to a whole new src tarball to
> upload to the archive rather than just a new diff, but hopefully this
> shouldn't happen too often.
I once did this, and usually I le
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:19:29PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:34:18PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> > I'm sure I've seen this hashed over in the past, so feel free to point me
> > at list archives.
> >
> > I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserv
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Martin Baehr wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:40:31PM -0500, John Belmonte wrote:
> > It turned out he agreed to omit the debian tree from his tarballs at my
> > request, but I also suggested he could just rename the directory to
> > debian_sample. In this way there would
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:19:29PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:34:18PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> > I'm sure I've seen this hashed over in the past, so feel free to point me
> > at list archives.
> >
> > I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserv
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 12:35, Martin Baehr wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:40:31PM -0500, John Belmonte wrote:
> > It turned out he agreed to omit the debian tree from his tarballs at my
> > request, but I also suggested he could just rename the directory to
> > debian_sample. In this way the
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:40:31PM -0500, John Belmonte wrote:
> It turned out he agreed to omit the debian tree from his tarballs at my
> request, but I also suggested he could just rename the directory to
> debian_sample. In this way there would be no interference with my work,
> and he could
This one time, at band camp, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
>asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
>project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
>good reason not to do this? It
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
good reason not to do this?
I think others have presented go
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Martin Baehr wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:40:31PM -0500, John Belmonte wrote:
> > It turned out he agreed to omit the debian tree from his tarballs at my
> > request, but I also suggested he could just rename the directory to
> > debian_sample. In this way there would
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 12:35, Martin Baehr wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:40:31PM -0500, John Belmonte wrote:
> > It turned out he agreed to omit the debian tree from his tarballs at my
> > request, but I also suggested he could just rename the directory to
> > debian_sample. In this way the
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:40:31PM -0500, John Belmonte wrote:
> It turned out he agreed to omit the debian tree from his tarballs at my
> request, but I also suggested he could just rename the directory to
> debian_sample. In this way there would be no interference with my work,
> and he could
This one time, at band camp, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
>asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
>project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
>good reason not to do this? It
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
good reason not to do this?
I think others have presented goo
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:34:18PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> I'm sure I've seen this hashed over in the past, so feel free to point me
> at list archives.
>
> I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been asked
> by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ director
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:34:18PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> I'm sure I've seen this hashed over in the past, so feel free to point me
> at list archives.
>
> I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been asked
> by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ director
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Jonathan!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
> > asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
> > project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Jonathan!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
> > asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
> > project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
Hi Jonathan!
You wrote:
> I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
> asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
> project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
> good reason not to do this?
I see very few problems w
Hi Jonathan!
You wrote:
> I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
> asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
> project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
> good reason not to do this?
I see very few problems w
22 matches
Mail list logo
