El día 17/02/2004 a 03:05 Joshua Kwan escribio ...
Hi,
> 1) You should work the build system so that the binary and manpage are
> built in the build-stamp target.
>
Done, I'm building only binary on build-stamp checking the .orig there's no
manpage for build, and original Makefile has a install
El día 17/02/2004 a 03:05 Joshua Kwan escribio ...
Hi,
> 1) You should work the build system so that the binary and manpage are
> built in the build-stamp target.
>
Done, I'm building only binary on build-stamp checking the .orig there's no
manpage for build, and original Makefile has a install
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:42:20AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:17AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Huh? I haven't looked at this, but why would one generate a new
> > .orig.tar.gz that isn't original? .diff.gz bloat is to be lived with.
>
> I guess the line between ke
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:17AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Huh? I haven't looked at this, but why would one generate a new
> .orig.tar.gz that isn't original? .diff.gz bloat is to be lived with.
I guess the line between keeping the diff.gz bloat and orig.tar.gz
constant with upstream is a gra
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:07:28AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> 2) You should remove Makefile from the orig.tar.gz in the clean target at
> some point and upload a new one. Currently, refreshing the Makefile that
> came in the orig.tar.gz causes major diff.gz bloat:
Huh? I haven't looked at this, b
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:42:20AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:17AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Huh? I haven't looked at this, but why would one generate a new
> > .orig.tar.gz that isn't original? .diff.gz bloat is to be lived with.
>
> I guess the line between ke
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:16:17AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Huh? I haven't looked at this, but why would one generate a new
> .orig.tar.gz that isn't original? .diff.gz bloat is to be lived with.
I guess the line between keeping the diff.gz bloat and orig.tar.gz
constant with upstream is a gra
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:07:28AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> 2) You should remove Makefile from the orig.tar.gz in the clean target at
> some point and upload a new one. Currently, refreshing the Makefile that
> came in the orig.tar.gz causes major diff.gz bloat:
Huh? I haven't looked at this, b
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 01:54:57AM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> Hi there, as i've said before [0] I'm willing to adpot xhangglider, I've
> worked on the package and I've finally uploaded [1] to mentors.debian.net.
> If there's anybody who wants to sponsor this package I'll appreciate to take
> a look
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 01:54:57AM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> Hi there, as i've said before [0] I'm willing to adpot xhangglider, I've
> worked on the package and I've finally uploaded [1] to mentors.debian.net.
> If there's anybody who wants to sponsor this package I'll appreciate to take
> a look
10 matches
Mail list logo
