On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:55:10PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Hi Mats,
> if a repackaging in order to circumvent GFDL-1.3 is not
> enough for you to proceed, then nothing will ever satisfy
> your desires. Still, I send a further reminder.
I just started to look at your package and I'm not
tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 19:32 skrev Laszlo Boszormenyi detta:
> On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:47 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Anyway, I have modified the watch file to use HTTP instead of FTP.
> > The new package has been uploaded to mentors.debian.net and it
> > awaits f
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:47 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 15:05 skrev Jonathan Wiltshire detta:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > However the
> > > watch file doesn't work behind my firewall. The best would be if
2010/12/21, Mats Erik Andersson :
> tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 18:46 skrev Lars Buitinck detta:
>> 2010/12/21, Mats Erik Andersson :
>> Maybe nitpicking here, but wouldn't it be wiser to use
>> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rush/ as the url? When I saw
>> gnu.org.ua, the first thing I d
tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 18:46 skrev Lars Buitinck detta:
> 2010/12/21, Mats Erik Andersson :
> > Anyway, I have modified the watch file to use HTTP instead of FTP.
> > The new package has been uploaded to mentors.debian.net and it
> > awaits further critisism.
>
> Maybe nitpicking here
2010/12/21, Mats Erik Andersson :
> Anyway, I have modified the watch file to use HTTP instead of FTP.
> The new package has been uploaded to mentors.debian.net and it
> awaits further critisism.
Maybe nitpicking here, but wouldn't it be wiser to use
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rush/ as the u
tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 15:05 skrev Jonathan Wiltshire detta:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > I can only second that the package is in a good shape. However the
> > watch file doesn't work behind my firewall. The best would be if you add
> > th
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> I can only second that the package is in a good shape. However the
> watch file doesn't work behind my firewall. The best would be if you add
> the passive option to it. I'll upload this package then.
Passive mode should not be
Hi Mats Erik,
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 14:20 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> The package is pedantically lintian clean and builds in
> pbuilder for testing as well as for unstable.
[...]
> I would please me if someone looked at this package and reported
> conclusions on the packaging.
I can only
söndag den 13 juni 2010 klockan 01:46 skrev Tim Retout detta:
> On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson
> wrote:
> > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
>
> I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the
This pleases me!
> project) shall have to discuss the
On 13 June 2010 12:47, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * George Danchev [100613 09:33]:
>> * the easy part: there is nothing wrong for non-DD to ask in advance if there
>> are interested sponsor(s) of the piece of software they intend to package or
>> adopt, especially with large and complex pieces. Th
* George Danchev [100613 09:33]:
> * the easy part: there is nothing wrong for non-DD to ask in advance if there
> are interested sponsor(s) of the piece of software they intend to package or
> adopt, especially with large and complex pieces. That would avoid wasting
> their time.
I don't know ab
Tim Retout writes:
> On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson
wrote:
> > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
>
> I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the
> project) shall have to discuss the sponsoring situation.
I will not be attending debconf10, but h
On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the
project) shall have to discuss the sponsoring situation.
> In comparison to the first packaging attempt, the Debian
> specific
On 4 June 2010 12:12, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> fredag den 4 juni 2010 klockan 20:58 skrev Ben Finney detta:
>> Mats Erik Andersson writes:
>>
>> > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
>>
>> What distinction are you drawing with that qualifier (???__active__???)?
>> What are y
Mats Erik Andersson writes:
> Well, I had one in the mid of April, he made a quick look, made an
> excuse for making it superficial, and have not been heard of since for
> this package, or for windowlab, which he also accepted.
There may be a misconception, then. A sponsor only has a commitment
fredag den 4 juni 2010 klockan 20:58 skrev Ben Finney detta:
> Mats Erik Andersson writes:
>
> > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
>
> What distinction are you drawing with that qualifier (???__active__???)?
> What are you seeking beyond a sponsor for the package?
Well, I ha
Mats Erik Andersson writes:
> I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
What distinction are you drawing with that qualifier (“__active__”)?
What are you seeking beyond a sponsor for the package?
--
\“The whole area of [treating source code as intellectual |
`\pro
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package looks good otherwise, you might want to get the Debian ruby
> > people to take a look:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/
>
> Judging from their archives, it seems to be unusual to get packages
>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:18:45AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the first revision of my "rush"
> > package. The source package can be downloaded from:
> Have you sent the patches and
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the first revision of my "rush"
> package. The source package can be downloaded from:
I don't know ruby, here are some comments:
Have you sent the patches and manual pages to upst
21 matches
Mail list logo
