On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson <mats.anders...@gisladisker.se> wrote: > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the project) shall have to discuss the sponsoring situation. > In comparison to the first packaging attempt, the Debian > specific documentation has been expanded, in particular > concerning chrooted service access, and a helper program > 'mkchroot-rush.pl' has been included in order to ease the > population of minimal chroot directories. There seems to be a typo in the 'Homepage' field in debian/control compared to debian/copyright. In debian/README.Debian, there is a mention of '/etc/rush.c' which should probably be '.rc', and 'outcommented' should be 'commented-out'. I would rephrase the last sentence of the long description to 'A notification service can be implemented individually for each provided service through the TCPMUX support found within xinetd. One thing I should have asked first time round is: does Debian need another restricted shell? We've already got rssh, which seems similar. Perhaps this merits a note in the long description as per: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-desc -- Tim Retout <t...@retout.co.uk> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinuqkmfbjgrj9zrpwcd276_mbpyrgjxgkror...@mail.gmail.com
