Am 06.05.2011 18:30, schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.1-1
> of my package "gtkpod".
>
> This is the last upstream release of a package already in Debian.
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> gtkpod- manage songs and playl
Hi Matteo!
Am 06.05.2011 18:30, schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.1-1
> of my package "gtkpod".
I don't own or use an iPod bug I'm willing to sponsor your updated gtkpod
package, as I'd like to see #613168 fixed
There are a few iss
On 09/05/2011 12:12, Etienne Millon wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
>>> - debian/rules :
>>> - why do you remove RPATHs from executables and binary ? It's stated
>>> briefly
>>> in NEWS.debian, but the reason is not there.
>>
>> Without this
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> > - debian/rules :
> > - why do you remove RPATHs from executables and binary ? It's stated
> > briefly
> > in NEWS.debian, but the reason is not there.
>
> Without this hack, it doesn't compile and build. I'll add a
On 09/05/2011 10:53, Etienne Millon wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
> As the usual disclaimer says, please not that I am not a DD and so, I can not
> sponsor this package. However here is my review of gtkpod_2.0.0-1 (md5sum of
> dsc
> in case it changed : c9d4216c068873d3939f310de582c671).
>
> - it build
Hello,
As the usual disclaimer says, please not that I am not a DD and so, I can not
sponsor this package. However here is my review of gtkpod_2.0.0-1 (md5sum of dsc
in case it changed : c9d4216c068873d3939f310de582c671).
- it builds in a clean chroot. However dpkg-shlibdeps complains about unn
On 06/05/2011 18:30, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.1-1
> of my package "gtkpod".
>
> [...]
Removed. It was too early. Maybe too much unstable.
I re-uploaded the stable release.
Sorry for the noise.
mfv
--
debian/rules!
--
Il
On 03/05/2011 19:17, Maia Kozheva wrote:
> For what it's worth, upstream maintains a PPA for Ubuntu that does include a
> libgtkpod-dev package for 2.0.0.
OK, thanks for the info.
--
Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi
--
Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o
contenuti pericolosi da Mai
For what it's worth, upstream maintains a PPA for Ubuntu that does include a
libgtkpod-dev package for 2.0.0.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Well, the joys of sid :)
I'll review this package after the transition is done.
> > [about libgtkpod-dev]
> Because I've never thought it could be used by any other software, since
> it was part of a specific source package.
It is quite common to distribute the whole software (client, library,
h
On 02/05/2011 17:14, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 02.05.2011 16:49, schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi:
>>
>> So I have only one alternative :-) And doesn't sound easy, at least for
>> me ;-) But I'll give me a try... maybe I could even succeed :-)
>>
>
> The right way to go about this is to find out if there
Am 02.05.2011 16:49, schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi:
>
> So I have only one alternative :-) And doesn't sound easy, at least for
> me ;-) But I'll give me a try... maybe I could even succeed :-)
>
The right way to go about this is to find out if there 3rd party packages using
this library, you need t
Ciao Arno,
On 02/05/2011 16:23, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi Matteo,
>
> On 02.05.2011 15:55, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
>> Yes, but no reply at present time. I asked them for info concerning who
>> should be the maintainer (me?) and the uploader (now the Frank orphaned
>> the package) to modify debian/co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Matteo,
On 02.05.2011 15:55, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Yes, but no reply at present time. I asked them for info concerning who
> should be the maintainer (me?) and the uploader (now the Frank orphaned
> the package) to modify debian/control file a
On 02/05/2011 15:27, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Bad timing I guess. The perl 5.12 transition just started yesterday.
> Will probably need a couple of days until this is sorted out.
:-( I'll eagerly wait.
> That said, while looking at your package briefly, I noticed that you
> split the library into a
Am 02.05.2011 10:04, schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi:
> On 02/05/2011 09:40, Etienne Millon wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Your package fails to build from source in an up-to-date sid chroot.
>> Please see the attached build log.
>>
>> I did not investigate further but something seems wrong with your
>> perl-rel
On 02/05/2011 09:40, Etienne Millon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Your package fails to build from source in an up-to-date sid chroot.
> Please see the attached build log.
>
> I did not investigate further but something seems wrong with your
> perl-related build-deps.
It seems to be a sid-related problem.
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:46:47PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.0-1
> of my package "gtkpod".
Hello,
Your package fails to build from source in an up-to-date sid chroot.
Please see the attached build log.
I did not investigate further but s
18 matches
Mail list logo
