On 02/05/2011 15:27, Michael Biebl wrote: > Bad timing I guess. The perl 5.12 transition just started yesterday. > Will probably need a couple of days until this is sorted out.
:-( I'll eagerly wait. > That said, while looking at your package briefly, I noticed that you > split the library into a separate package libgtkpod1. > Yet there is no corresponding libgtkpod-dev package. And there'll never be, I guess ;-) > If the library is meant to be used by other packages (is there one?), > then you'd need to include the dev package. If the library is only used > internally, then it should either be linked statically into gtkpod or > moved to /usr/lib/gtkpod. It's used only internally; once I'll have a working sid box again, I'll re-build the package moving the lib to /usr/lib/gtkpod. Thanks for the hint. > Have you consulted upstream about this? Yes, but no reply at present time. I asked them for info concerning who should be the maintainer (me?) and the uploader (now the Frank orphaned the package) to modify debian/control file accordingly. Never thought the split of the library could be an issue; it has been suggested by the guys in #debian-mentors to resolv a lintian warning. Once they'll knock on my door, I'll ask them even about this. Thank you for the advice. > Michael Matteo -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dbeb7eb.7050...@revese.it
