Re: Package adopt

2003-07-11 Thread cermi
I found the instructions you were talking about. If you are going to adopt a package, retitle its bug to replace `O' with >`ITA', in order for other people to know the package is being adopted and to >prevent its automatic removal from the archive. This is done. To actually adopt the package,

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-11 Thread Thomas Viehmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote*: > >> Include the following line in fda's changelog file: >> >> * New maintainer. (closes: #192657) >> [... same for judy ...] >I'm not sure about this. These 'bugs' are just the report that the package >is orphan aren't they? The only thing I have to do is send a mail

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-11 Thread cermi
Include the following line in fda's changelog file: * New maintainer. (closes: #192657) And the following line judy's changelog file: * New maintainer. (closes: #172772) I'm not sure about this. These 'bugs' are just the report that the package is orphan aren't they? The only thing

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-11 Thread cermi
I found the instructions you were talking about. If you are going to adopt a package, retitle its bug to replace `O' with >`ITA', in order for other people to know the package is being adopted and to >prevent its automatic removal from the archive. This is done. To actually adopt the package,

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-11 Thread Thomas Viehmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote*: > >> Include the following line in fda's changelog file: >> >> * New maintainer. (closes: #192657) >> [... same for judy ...] >I'm not sure about this. These 'bugs' are just the report that the package >is orphan aren't they? The only thing I have to do is send a mail

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-11 Thread cermi
Include the following line in fda's changelog file: * New maintainer. (closes: #192657) And the following line judy's changelog file: * New maintainer. (closes: #172772) I'm not sure about this. These 'bugs' are just the report that the package is orphan aren't they? The only thing I

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-09 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 14:24 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Include the following line in fda's changelog file: > > > > * New maintainer. (closes: #192657) > > > [snip] > > Repackage both fda and judy, and you'll be ready to look for a sponsor. > > Should the Maintainer in the control file be chan

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-09 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 14:24 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Include the following line in fda's changelog file: > > > > * New maintainer. (closes: #192657) > > > [snip] > > Repackage both fda and judy, and you'll be ready to look for a sponsor. > > Should the Maintainer in the control file be chan

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-09 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*: >Should the Maintainer in the control file be changed or not? Yes. Cheers T.

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-09 Thread Luk Claes
> Include the following line in fda's changelog file: > > * New maintainer. (closes: #192657) > [snip] > Repackage both fda and judy, and you'll be ready to look for a sponsor. Should the Maintainer in the control file be changed or not? Kind regards Luk Claes

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-09 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*: >Should the Maintainer in the control file be changed or not? Yes. Cheers T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-09 Thread Luk Claes
> Include the following line in fda's changelog file: > > * New maintainer. (closes: #192657) > [snip] > Repackage both fda and judy, and you'll be ready to look for a sponsor. Should the Maintainer in the control file be changed or not? Kind regards Luk Claes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-09 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 21:20 -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:02:38PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > > You also need to subscribe to various debian lists. In particular, you > > must subscribe to debian-devel. > > Bzzt, only debian-devel-announce is required. Thank

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-08 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 21:20 -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:02:38PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > > You also need to subscribe to various debian lists. In particular, you > > must subscribe to debian-devel. > > Bzzt, only debian-devel-announce is required. Thank

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-08 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:02:38PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > You also need to subcribe to various debian lists. In particular, you > must subscribe to debian-devel. Bzzt, only debian-devel-announce is required. -Josh -- "Notice that, written there, rather legibly, in the Baroque s

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-08 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm interested in working in the packages > I mentioned in my e-mail > fda: C malloc debug library (package info) http://packages.qa.debian.org/fda http://bugs.debian.org/192657 > judy: C library for creating and accessing dynamic ar

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-08 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:02:38PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > You also need to subcribe to various debian lists. In particular, you > must subscribe to debian-devel. Bzzt, only debian-devel-announce is required. -Josh -- "Notice that, written there, rather legibly, in the Baroque s

Re: Package adopt

2003-07-08 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm interested in working in the packages > I mentioned in my e-mail > fda: C malloc debug library (package info) http://packages.qa.debian.org/fda http://bugs.debian.org/192657 > judy: C library for creating and accessing dynamic ar