Bob Proulx wrote:
John Lightsey wrote:
If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are s
Bob Proulx wrote:
John Lightsey wrote:
If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are stil
John Lightsey wrote:
> If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
> feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
> The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are still -O9
referenc
John Lightsey wrote:
> If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
> feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
> The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are still -O9
referenc
On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
...
>Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any
>architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on
>less mature ports this can cause trouble.
>
>As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them
On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
...
>Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any
>architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on
>less mature ports this can cause trouble.
>
>As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0600, John Lightsey wrote:
> I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
> !x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
> but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
John Lightsey wrote:
> I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
> !x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
> but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
> someone could download, build, and test
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0600, John Lightsey wrote:
> I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
> !x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
> but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
John Lightsey wrote:
> I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
> !x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
> but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
> someone could download, build, and test
10 matches
Mail list logo
