> I am getting strange errors from lintian:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/epson$ lintian -i stcolortool_0.3.1-0_i386.changes
> internal error: cannot open unpacked/debian/ directory: No such file or
> directory
> internal error: collect info debfiles about package stcolortool: No such file
> or directo
> I am getting strange errors from lintian:
>
> roger@mars:~/epson$ lintian -i stcolortool_0.3.1-0_i386.changes
> internal error: cannot open unpacked/debian/ directory: No such file or
> directory
> internal error: collect info debfiles about package stcolortool: No such file
> or directory
> N
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 01:46:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Is it ok to put a symlink in /usr/doc to link stcolortool to
> stcolortool-lprng?
If stcolortool package has Depends: stcolortool-lprng. (or the other way
around, maybe I misunderstood you)
> I modified the following target (from the
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 01:46:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Is it ok to put a symlink in /usr/doc to link stcolortool to
> stcolortool-lprng?
If stcolortool package has Depends: stcolortool-lprng. (or the other way
around, maybe I misunderstood you)
> I modified the following target (from the
Manu thanks for all your help, I am now successfully building multiple
binaries! I used configure with VPATH to build and install with DESTDIR.
However, there are a few things I would like to clarify:
Is it ok to put a symlink in /usr/doc to link stcolortool to
stcolortool-lprng?
I modified the f
Manu thanks for all your help, I am now successfully building multiple
binaries! I used configure with VPATH to build and install with DESTDIR.
However, there are a few things I would like to clarify:
Is it ok to put a symlink in /usr/doc to link stcolortool to
stcolortool-lprng?
I modified the
On 20001023T101336+0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> > I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> > set of options.
On 20001023T101336+0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> > I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> > set of options
Thanks for all the suggestions. I will try and get everything working
later on today.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh ** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~rl117/linux/
For GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] or see
Thanks for all the suggestions. I will try and get everything working
later on today.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh ** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~rl117/linux/
For GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] or see
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> set of options. I don't remember whether I had to patch upstream build
> sys
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> set of options. I don't remember whether I had to patch upstream build
> sy
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:03:07PM +0100, Steve Dobson wrote:
> > > dh_testdir
> > > mkdir option1-build-dir
> > > cd option1-build-dir
> > > ../configure --with-one-set-of-options && $(MAKE)
> > > cd ..
> >
> > Only you can't have cd's on separate lines, be
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:13:27PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:07:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > dh_testdir
> > mkdir option1-build-dir
> > cd option1-build-dir
> > ../configure --with-one-set-of-options && $(MAKE)
> > cd .
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:07:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the
> > > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install
> > > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations),
> >
> >
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:03:07PM +0100, Steve Dobson wrote:
> > > dh_testdir
> > > mkdir option1-build-dir
> > > cd option1-build-dir
> > > ../configure --with-one-set-of-options && $(MAKE)
> > > cd ..
> >
> > Only you can't have cd's on separate lines, b
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 06:13:27PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:07:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > dh_testdir
> > mkdir option1-build-dir
> > cd option1-build-dir
> > ../configure --with-one-set-of-options && $(MAKE)
> > cd
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the
> > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install
> > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two location
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:07:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the
> > > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install
> > > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations),
> >
>
On 20001021T205917+0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I have made a package with debhelper and dh_make, which produces a single
> binary deb. However, now I would like to make two binaries from the same
> packages, identical except for that each is built with different options
> to configure (one has suppo
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the
> > build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install
> > rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locatio
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the
> build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install
> rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations),
Well, it's simple reall
On 20001021T205917+0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I have made a package with debhelper and dh_make, which produces a single
> binary deb. However, now I would like to make two binaries from the same
> packages, identical except for that each is built with different options
> to configure (one has supp
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I fail to see how to run configure twice, with different options in the
> build-stamp rule and then install both into the right place in the install
> rule (I just get identical stuff pacakged in two locations),
Well, it's simple real
24 matches
Mail list logo
