On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 01:46:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Is it ok to put a symlink in /usr/doc to link stcolortool to > stcolortool-lprng?
If stcolortool package has Depends: stcolortool-lprng. (or the other way around, maybe I misunderstood you) > I modified the following target (from the debhelper rules.multi2 example) > to depend on build and install, otherwise nothing would be installed. Is > this acceptable (I am using DH_COMPAT=2)? > > binary-arch: build install > $(MAKE) -f debian/rules DH_OPTIONS=-a binary-common Erm, it's like that in /usr/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi2. I don't see any changes. > I am getting strange errors from lintian: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/epson$ lintian -i stcolortool_0.3.1-0_i386.changes > internal error: cannot open unpacked/debian/ directory: No such file or > directory > internal error: collect info debfiles about package stcolortool: No such file > or directory > N: Skipping check of source package stcolortool You should file a bug against lintian, because this says it's an _internal_ error. > If I want the packages to be mutually exclusive, should I use Conflicts: > as well as Replaces: (when I did not put in a Conflicts:, I could install > both at once, seemingly, although one must have been overwritten). Use just Conflicts: if one can't coexist with the other. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification