Can you take discussions like these to d-d? Cause I think any
prospective packagers just turn away after reading threads like these.
Is it possible to keep these list for mentees to talk to sponsors
about questions problems and RFS and not use it as d-d death match
platform. Could you please discu
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 00:49, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> ps. please CC me on replies as I'm not subscribed to d-mentors
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:20, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> ps. Please DON'T CC me on replies, I've had enough of this
ahahah
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
> Or you can point people who don't want to learn how to package things
> properly
I don't care about those either -- the intended audience was those that could
use a tutorial to get a feel for the process before they make up their mind
about "how to package things properly" and to eventually adop
On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 00:53, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > There's a tradeoff: encouraging potential new contributors (in the hope
> > that
>
> and do you think you're in position to take this tradeoff? I don't think
> so.
>
> > they'll eventually rea
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:48:07PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote [edited]:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 22:19, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> re-evaluating your contributions it's a complete waste of time, so
That was the whole point: my contributions weren't good enough and I asked
what contributions *you*
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 22:19, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Sandro, in your first reply, you suggested 3 alternatives, one of which was
> "fix it". You seem to be quite upset despite me taking into account your
> specific suggestions for improvements. I'm just curious, what more would it
> take for
Sandro, in your first reply, you suggested 3 alternatives, one of which was
"fix it". You seem to be quite upset despite me taking into account your
specific suggestions for improvements. I'm just curious, what more would it
take for you to consider it fixed?
I see your point about low-quality RFS
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 00:53, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> There's a tradeoff: encouraging potential new contributors (in the hope that
and do you think you're in position to take this tradeoff? I don't think so.
> they'll eventually read all the docs) at the cost of initially lower-quality
> RFS
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:53:32AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:01:30AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:00, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > > Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for
> > > technical-minded
> > > debian user
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:01:30AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:00, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for technical-minded
> > debian users that (a) want to contribute to debian, but are uncertain about
> > their long-ter
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:00, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for technical-minded
> debian users that (a) want to contribute to debian, but are uncertain about
> their long-term time-commitment; and (b) given their uncertain commitment,
> won't
Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for technical-minded
debian users that (a) want to contribute to debian, but are uncertain about
their long-term time-commitment; and (b) given their uncertain commitment,
won't read the whole policy, devref, and newmaint guide just for the sa
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 00:49, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Those interested in packaging, but not certain about making a long-term
> commitment might be interested in a practical primer for QA uploads:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/QAUploadsPrimer
>
> (A QA upload is a one-off maintenance act
13 matches
Mail list logo
