Re: Best way to package skippy

2005-03-03 Thread Olivier Trichet
Le Jeudi 3 Mars 2005 09:46, Niv Altivanik (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > first I'd appreciate you stop CCing me as I do read the mailing list > ... > > I think I'll apply the patch, as it looks like a policy fix, and will > > use Steve's solution, witch is appending to the README file: >

Re: Best way to package skippy

2005-03-03 Thread Debian
first I'd appreciate you stop CCing me as I do read the mailing list ... I think I'll apply the patch, as it looks like a policy fix, and will use Steve's solution, witch is appending to the README file: > 'Add the following in /etc/X11/XSession.d/99skippy if you wish > the program to be starte

Re: Best way to package skippy [was: Re: [RFS][ITP] Skippy, gcursor, glurp. ]

2005-03-03 Thread Steve Kemp
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:24:59AM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > > What do you people think of modifying the window managers to look for > > skippy and start it when initing? For example, we could patch metacity > > to have an option on its capplet that allows you to enable skippy-like > > fu

Re: Best way to package skippy [was: Re: [RFS][ITP] Skippy, gcursor, glurp. ]

2005-03-02 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 09:03 -0600, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > Perhaps: > > > > skippy > > skippy-gnome > > skippy-icewm > > skippy-kde > > I don't like this idea. As you said yourself it's completely overkill. > > > Do you have some specific suggestion on how it should

Re: Best way to package skippy

2005-03-02 Thread Steve Kemp
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 07:39:42AM +0100, Niv Altivanik wrote: > > Are you packages from http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian updated against the > > ones sitting on NEW? > I've just reuploded them there ( the skippy-0.5.0-cdbs directory ). Once the current package has made it out of NEW I'll happily

Re: Best way to package skippy

2005-03-02 Thread Debian
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think your ideas are great, I'm just concerned about how the users are > supposed to run skippy after installing it. The upstream position is to have them run it by hand, I think I'll stick to the README.Debian position ( for now .. ) > Are you

Re: Best way to package skippy

2005-03-02 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 15:32 +0100, Niv Altivanik wrote: > If any one feels to do the changes, I'd gladly integrate them to the > skippy package. I think your ideas are great, I'm just concerned about how the users are supposed to run skippy after installing it. Are you packages from http://cxhome

Re: Best way to package skippy

2005-03-02 Thread Debian
--- Note to Steve Kemp: This would be my reply, if I seem to ... hard-edged, please do not forward it to the others CC: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debian Mentors ML , [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-desktop@lists.debian.org --- Hi, I've been packaging skippy

Re: Best way to package skippy [was: Re: [RFS][ITP] Skippy, gcursor, glurp. ]

2005-03-01 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Seg, 2005-02-28 Ãs 09:25 +, Steve Kemp escreveu: > It is currently setup such that the user must run it manually, and > there is no attempt made to install it on a system-wide, or per-user > basis. > > I think this is the correct approach to take for a first stab at > the package and

Re: Best way to package skippy [was: Re: [RFS][ITP] Skippy, gcursor, glurp. ]

2005-02-28 Thread Steve Kemp
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:07:45AM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > Skippy is a nice piece of software. Agreed. > Gustavo Noronha and I were talking (in CONSOL[1]) about how would be the > best way to package skippy. Honestly, I haven't had the chance to check > any ITP/related-work on this,

Re: Best way to package skippy [was: Re: [RFS][ITP] Skippy, gcursor, glurp. ]

2005-02-28 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 02:07 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > Cheers, Forgot about my references: 1: http://www.consol.org.mx/2005/ 2: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ UNIX is an O.S., OS/2 is half an O.S., Windows is a she