Re:   libraries without version in SONAME

2004-12-27 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:17:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What package? Is it itself a library? Do other packages actually use > > its library? > No Are there multiple executables? If not, then you might as well just use static linking. Maybe note your rationale in README.Debian.

Re:  libraries without version in SONAME

2004-12-27 Thread Justin Pryzby
What package? Is it itself a library? Do other packages actually use its library? Justin On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:06:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello > > >>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 12:36:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> I was looking into packaging a software that has

Re: libraries without version in SONAME

2004-12-27 Thread radus
Hello >>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 12:36:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I was looking into packaging a software that has a soname: >>> SONAME libyate.so >>> but no version, and also upstream doesn't want any version on this > library. >>> During dh_shlibdeps i get : >>> dpkg-shlibd

Re: libraries without version in SONAME

2004-12-26 Thread radus
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 12:36:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hello >> >> I was looking into packaging a software that has a soname: >> SONAME libyate.so >> but no version, and also upstream doesn't want any version on this library. >> During dh_shlibdeps i get : >> dpkg-shlibdeps:

Re: libraries without version in SONAME

2004-12-26 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 12:36:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello > > I was looking into packaging a software that has a soname: > SONAME libyate.so > but no version, and also upstream doesn't want any version on this library. > During dh_shlibdeps i get : > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning