Re: RFS: whohas (bugfixes)

2009-01-30 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:31:16PM +, Martin Meredith wrote: > Uploaded, couldn't find any issues. Cheers :-) -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: whohas (bugfixes)

2009-01-30 Thread Martin Meredith
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:51:35PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi Paul/George/others > > I'm looking for sponsorship for whohas/0.22-3, which closes these bugs: > 510020 510524 513466 513473 513476 > > Partiularly, 510020 and 510524 are aging a bit, so it would be nice to > tidy them up. P

RFS: whohas (bugfixes)

2009-01-30 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi Paul/George/others I'm looking for sponsorship for whohas/0.22-3, which closes these bugs: 510020 510524 513466 513473 513476 Partiularly, 510020 and 510524 are aging a bit, so it would be nice to tidy them up. Pedantic lintian is clean, and all the patches have gone upstream. You can find th

Re: [uploaded] Re: RFS: whohas (bugfix)

2009-01-26 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 26 January 2009 22:24:12 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: --cut-- > > Sure, that particular README.Debian is somehow superfluous here (and > > could be removed in the next release, Jonathan: hint, hint, but no rush > > or you will need some jumbo sponsors ;-), since it duplicates > > description

Re: [uploaded] Re: RFS: whohas (bugfix)

2009-01-26 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:04:58PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > Why do you think the information in README.Debian is relevant to anyone > > installing the package? > > > > Also, some typos in README.Debian: > > Intrebid > > wih > > upsream > > Sure, that particular README.Debian is somehow sup

[uploaded] Re: RFS: whohas (bugfix)

2009-01-26 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 26 January 2009 20:55:09 Raphael Geissert wrote: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.22-2.dsc > > Why do you think the information in README.Debian is relevant to anyone > installing the package? > > Also, some typos in README.Debian: > Intrebid > wih > upsrea

Re: RFS: whohas (bugfix)

2009-01-26 Thread Raphael Geissert
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.22-2.dsc Why do you think the information in README.Debian is relevant to anyone installing the package? Also, some typos in README.Debian: Intrebid wih upsream Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.de

RFS: whohas (bugfix)

2009-01-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi Paul (and others) whohas/0.22-2 closes two bugs which have gone to upstream, but he is too busy to take of them for the time being so they are stil dpatches. They are quite small patches so hopefully should be a simple review. If you've time to take a look the dsc is at http://mentors.debian.n

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-09 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 09 January 2009 10:13:26 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:38:33AM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > > I'd appreciate if someone else could sponsor this for now; my > > > internets are slow ATM. > > > > whohas 0.22-1 uploaded. > > Cheers! Jonathan, I forgot to

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-09 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:38:33AM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > I'd appreciate if someone else could sponsor this for now; my > > internets are slow ATM. > > whohas 0.22-1 uploaded. Cheers! Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB8

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 09 January 2009 07:38:48 Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire > > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:52:37PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > >> Either is fine, slight leaning towards no need for a bump (so I don't > >> have to remember to use debuild -v...).

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:52:37PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: >> Either is fine, slight leaning towards no need for a bump (so I don't >> have to remember to use debuild -v...). > > NP, uploaded to the same location. I'd appreciate if someo

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:52:37PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > Either is fine, slight leaning towards no need for a bump (so I don't > have to remember to use debuild -v...). NP, uploaded to the same location. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E D

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, January 8, 2009 11:19, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Devref mentions NEWS.Debian as a changelog supplement: "This is the > preferred means to let the user know [...] changes in a package" [1]. I > didn't use README.Debian as the same paragraph seems to discourage this, > but if you think it w

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:37:52PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: >> >> I interpret that as being the changes since earlier versions of the >> package, rather than changes to the upstream source code. > > Ok, if you think README.Debian is accept

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:37:52PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > > I interpret that as being the changes since earlier versions of the > package, rather than changes to the upstream source code. Ok, if you think README.Debian is acceptable I will move the notes to there. Would you like a version bum

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:26:45PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: >> > I've also included a NEWS file detailing the patches >> > that are still active. >> >> I don't think that is an appropriate use of NEWS.Debian, documenting >> them in the pat

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:26:45PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > > I've also included a NEWS file detailing the patches > > that are still active. > > I don't think that is an appropriate use of NEWS.Debian, documenting > them in the patch headers should be enough. You might want to check > policy/dev

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:00:23AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Great. As I think this can be very useful to Debian developers, I have > added a news item to the DeveloperNews queue, which will be posted to > debian-devel-annnounce sometime in the near future: > http://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperN

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Jonathan, On Thu, January 8, 2009 07:26, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire > wrote: >> I have uploaded whohas 0.22-1 to m.d.n, which is a new upstream >> integrating a lot of the bugs, and some tweaks to the packaging because >> of his changes. Great. As I

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > I have uploaded whohas 0.22-1 to m.d.n, which is a new upstream > integrating a lot of the bugs, and some tweaks to the packaging because > of his changes. ... > I've also included a NEWS file detailing the patches > that are still activ

RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-07 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi Paul I have uploaded whohas 0.22-1 to m.d.n, which is a new upstream integrating a lot of the bugs, and some tweaks to the packaging because of his changes. I've also included a NEWS file detailing the patches that are still active. Lintian -iI seems to be clean, and I have tested each of the

Re: RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

2009-01-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:51:26AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: >> It might be a good idea to allow some kind of config file to override >> the URLs/regexes, this would be useful for when the external websites >> change and the package has not been u

Re: RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

2009-01-03 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi Paul On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:51:26AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > It might be a good idea to allow some kind of config file to override > the URLs/regexes, this would be useful for when the external websites > change and the package has not been updated yet. Could you suggest > this upstream?

Re: RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

2008-12-30 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Ok, sorry for the noise. I wasn't sure how closely you were watching > -mentors. NP. I watch it quite closely, reading all the mails at least daily. > I've uploaded 0.21-4 to m.d.n which closes bugs 510189, 510231, 510259, > 510152 a

Re: RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

2008-12-30 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:59:44AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > > Next time, please depend on ${DPATCH_STAMPFN} instead of patch-stamp > in debian/rules. Done. > For the manual page change, once the manual page is accepted upstream, > I would suggest a sed command in debian/rules install or binary

Re: RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

2008-12-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > I've uploaded whohas/0.21-3 to m.d.n which has patches to close bugs > 5099975, 510019 and 509981. They have gone upstream for his next > release. Uploaded. Next time, please depend on ${DPATCH_STAMPFN} instead of patch-stamp in debia

RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

2008-12-29 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi Paul (and mentors) I've uploaded whohas/0.21-3 to m.d.n which has patches to close bugs 5099975, 510019 and 509981. They have gone upstream for his next release. If you have a moment to take a look and upload sometime I'd appreciate it. The dsc is at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/

Re: RFS: whohas

2008-12-09 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:37:44PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > Uploaded. Thanks! > In the next upload, please remove the duplicate space in the last > paragraph of the description. Will do. > Why was your orig.tar.gz not the same as upstream's? Please always use > the upstream tarball unless it h

Re: RFS: whohas

2008-12-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uploaded to > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.21-2.dsc Uploaded. In the next upload, please remove the duplicate space in the last paragraph of the description. Why was your orig.tar.gz

Re: RFS: whohas

2008-12-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:29:21PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > Why do you have Vcs-Browser, but not Vcs-Git? I wasn't happy that git:// was working properly on that machine, but it seems to be fine so included the field. > ${shlibs:Depends} isn't needed because whohas is a perl script. Removed. >

Re: RFS: whohas

2008-12-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.21-1.dsc > Even if you are unable to sponsor I would appreciate a review. Here is a review: Why do you have Vcs-Browser, but not Vcs-Git? ${shlibs:Depends

RFS: whohas

2008-12-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "whohas". * Package name: whohas Version : 0.21-1 Upstream Author : Philipp Wesche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.philippwesche.org/200811/whohas/intro.html * License : GPL Section : util