Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated package)

2009-02-19 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:07:13 +0100 Johann Rudloff napsal(a): > The package appears to be lintian clean. It does not appear so for me: $ lintian -IE --pendantic uncrustify_0.51-1_amd64.changes P: uncrustify source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system config.log W: uncrustify source

RFS: uncrustify (updated package)

2009-02-18 Thread Johann Rudloff
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.51-1 of my package "uncrustify". It builds these binary packages: uncrustify - C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code beautifier Uncrustify is a highly configurable source code formatter. It aligns preprocessor define's, assigment

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated existing package)

2008-07-22 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi Johann, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.48-1 > of my package "uncrustify". > > It builds these binary packages: > uncrustify - C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code beautifier > Uncrustify is a highly configurable source code formatter. > It aligns preprocessor define's

RFS: uncrustify (updated existing package)

2008-07-22 Thread Johann Rudloff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.48-1 of my package "uncrustify". It builds these binary packages: uncrustify - C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code beautifier Uncrustify is a highly configurable source code formatt

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated existing package)

2008-06-21 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du dimanche 15 juin 2008, vers 22:12, Johann Rudloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.47-1 > of my package "uncrustify". > It builds these binary packages: > uncrustify - C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code bea

RFS: uncrustify (updated existing package)

2008-06-15 Thread Johann Rudloff
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.47-1 of my package "uncrustify". It builds these binary packages: uncrustify - C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code beautifier Uncrustify is a highly configurable source code formatter. It aligns preprocessor define's, assigmen

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated existing package)

2008-02-24 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Hello, Am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2008 11:55:40 schrieb Johann Rudloff: > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Sponsored. Greetings Winnie > > Kind regards > Johann Rudloff -- .''`. Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : GNU/Linux Debian Developer `. `'` http:/

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated existing package)

2008-02-24 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2008 11:55:40 schrieb Johann Rudloff: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.44-1 > of my package "uncrustify". Hey,, I'll take a look. Feel free to write me the next time in private. Thanks in advance :) Greetings Winnie -- .''`. Patric

RFS: uncrustify (updated existing package)

2008-02-24 Thread Johann Rudloff
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.44-1 of my package "uncrustify". It builds these binary packages: uncrustify - C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code beautifier Long description: Uncrustify is a highly configurable source code formatter. It aligns preprocessor

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated package) (second try)

2008-02-12 Thread Johann Rudloff
Hi, reading the thread "Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file" on this list, I think I now found the right way(TM) to handle config.{sub,guess} files: The two files are removed (using rm -f) in the clean target, but then the source package would generate a Lintian error as in the above mentioned

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated package) (second try)

2008-02-11 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Am Montag, 11. Februar 2008 22:18:43 schrieb Johann Rudloff: > Am Sonntag, den 10.02.2008, 21:39 +0100 schrieb Patrick Winnertz: > > - remove config.{sub|guess} in clean target > > - you forgot to mention in changelog that you added a Homepage tag to > > debian/control > > - you forgot to mentio

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated package) (second try)

2008-02-11 Thread Johann Rudloff
Am Sonntag, den 10.02.2008, 21:39 +0100 schrieb Patrick Winnertz: > - remove config.{sub|guess} in clean target > - you forgot to mention in changelog that you added a Homepage tag to > debian/control > - you forgot to mention that you removed autotools-dev as Build-Dep > - you forgot to menti

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated package) (second try)

2008-02-10 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2008 15:57:45 schrieb Johann Rudloff: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.43-1 > of my package "uncrustify". > > It builds these binary packages: > uncrustify - C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code beautifier > > The package appears to be

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated package) (second try)

2008-02-10 Thread Johann Rudloff
Hi, since I left it out in the previous mail, I add some description of the package to my RFS: uncrustify: C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code beautifier Uncrustify is a highly configurable source code formatter. It aligns preprocessor define's, assigments, arithmetics and is able t

RFS: uncrustify (updated package) (second try)

2008-02-10 Thread Johann Rudloff
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.43-1 of my package "uncrustify". It builds these binary packages: uncrustify - C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code beautifier The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 461631 The package can be

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2008-01-20 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi Johann, On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 17:13 +0100, Johann Rudloff wrote: > I am looking for a new sponsor for my updated package "uncrustify". Your package has two things to mention. First is that your package builds fine without autotools-dev, don't know why it is a build-dependency. Moreover 'Homepa

RFS: uncrustify

2008-01-20 Thread Johann Rudloff
Dear mentors, I am looking for a new sponsor for my updated package "uncrustify". * Package name: uncrustify Version : 0.43-1 Upstream Author : Ben Gardner * URL : http://uncrustify.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : devel It builds these bin

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-27 Thread Daniel Baumann
Joey Hess wrote: > At any > time a new version of a debhelper command could need to add a new > dependency to misc:Depends, and this only works if you keep it in your > depends line. if this is unsure that it may indeed happen in a future minor version of debhelper, as you imply to say, then i don

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-26 Thread Joey Hess
Daniel Baumann wrote: > * ${misc:Depends} is useless here Please don't ask people to remove "useless" misc:Depends lines. At any time a new version of a debhelper command could need to add a new dependency to misc:Depends, and this only works if you keep it in your depends line. -- see shy jo

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-26 Thread Daniel Baumann
Johann Rudloff wrote: > I hope everything is alright now. yes, it is fine now. thanks for your quite response. i just uploaded it. if you need further sponsoring, contact me off-list http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsoring.html#contact -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunders

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-26 Thread Johann Rudloff
I've added the copyright holders' names to the license texts and put in my correspondence with David Thompson. I hope everything is alright now. New package: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uncrustify/uncrustify_0.30-1.dsc Johann Rudloff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-26 Thread Daniel Baumann
Johann Rudloff wrote: > I've put the additional license information in debian/copyright and > tried to do it like in the example you provided. you listed first all copyright holders, which is (optionally) ok, but you didn't list them in all of each license stanzas. e.g. in the first license stanz

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-26 Thread Johann Rudloff
I've put the additional license information in debian/copyright and tried to do it like in the example you provided. I wrote to the copyright holder of the file scripts/cmpcfg.pl (David Thompson) and in his response, he told me, that "the file cmpcfg.pl should be licenced as GPL" so I added a shor

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-26 Thread Daniel Baumann
Johann Rudloff wrote: >> * your debian/copyright is incomplete, there are files copyrighted by >> others than you mentioned in debain/copyright. look at >> tinyerp-client from unstable how to do a multiple-copyright-holder >> copyright file. > I were not sure, wether to include the ye

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-26 Thread Johann Rudloff
> * imho, priority optional is here better than extra. Corrected > * ${misc:Depends} is useless here Removed > * your debian/copyright is incomplete, there are files copyrighted by > others than you mentioned in debain/copyright. look at > tinyerp-client from unstable how to do a m

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
Johann Rudloff wrote: > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uncrustify/uncrustify_0.30-1.dsc * imho, priority optional is here better than extra. * ${misc:Depends} is useless here * your debian/copyright is incomplete, there are files copyrighted by others than you m

RFS: uncrustify

2006-11-25 Thread Johann Rudloff
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uncrustify". * Package name: uncrustify Version : 0.30-1 Upstream Author : Ben Gardner * URL : http://uncrustify.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : devel It builds these binary package