Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rush":
* Package name: rush
Version : 2.3-1
Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff
* URL : https://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/rush/
* License : custom-
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2022 09:05:58 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- restricted user
shell
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012200,
regarding RFS: rush/2.2-1 [ITA] -- restricted user shell
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
The rush package has a new upload:
rush (2.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release (Closes: #1001091)
* Fix rush FTCBFS (Closes: #929160)
* Update Standards-Version to 4.6.1
* Drop debian/patches/intprops.patch(applied upstream)
* Drop deb
Am 17.06.22 um 10:30 schrieb Bo YU:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:42:38AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:
* drop debian/patches/intprops.patch
* drop debian/patches/format_security.diff
Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes wh
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:42:38AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:
* drop debian/patches/intprops.patch
* drop debian/patches/format_security.diff
Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes when you have
not addressed his previo
Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:
* drop debian/patches/intprops.patch
* drop debian/patches/format_security.diff
Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes when you have
not addressed his previous comments.
You have not included an explanation about the patches.
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 07:18:23PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 22:37:48 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
What happened to format_security.diff?
Why did you remove it? It should still be valid but maybe needs a rebase.
Ok. I got huzz hint when applying the patch and i forget to reco
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rush":
* Package name: rush
Version : 2.2+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff
* URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/rush/
* License : cus
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 22:37:48 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
>What happened to format_security.diff?
>Why did you remove it? It should still be valid but maybe needs a rebase.
Ok. I got huzz hint when applying the patch and i forget to record it
here.
That is not the way you should do things: Just dropping
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:49:48PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:20:33 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release (Closes: #1001091)
There is no need to repack the doc directory anymore since 1.9 changed the
license.
I have removed the repa
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:20:33 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release (Closes: #1001091)
There is no need to repack the doc directory anymore since 1.9 changed the
license.
I have removed the repacking stuff in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rush/-/commit/ef5
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rush":
* Package name: rush
Version : 2.2+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff
* URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/rush/
* License : cus
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:20:33 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
Changes since the last upload:
rush (2.2+dfsg-1.0) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release (Closes: #1001091)
* fix rush FTCBFS (Closes: #929160)
* Update Standards-Version to 4.6.1
* drop
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rush":
* Package name: rush
Version : 2.2+dfsg-1.0
Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff
* URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/rush/
* License : c
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:11:52 + (UTC)
with message-id <1704688462.9068069.1482127912...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#846399: RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.
has caused the Debian Bug report #846399,
regarding RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New
Fredag den 9:e december 2016, klockan 12:45, skrev Gianfranco Costamagna detta:
> Hi,
>
> >There is no problem to fetch the key. The problem is to use it. My present
>
> >use case is this
> >
> > gpgv --homedir debian/upstream --keyring debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp \
> >archive.sig archi
Hi,
>There is no problem to fetch the key. The problem is to use it. My present
>use case is this
>
> gpgv --homedir debian/upstream --keyring debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp \
>archive.sig archive
>
>You are requesting me to use 'debian/upstream/signing-key.asc', an armoured key
>which gpg
Onsdag den 7:e december 2016, klockan 23:38, skrev Gianfranco Costamagna detta:
>
> >> please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the
> >> include-binaries file?
> >
> >Then I need education on the procedure to create a keyring file on the go,
> >since gpgv only handles keyrings, not
Hi
>> please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries
>> file?
>
>
>Then I need education on the procedure to create a keyring file on the go,
>since gpgv only handles keyrings, not armoured keyfiles.
https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#Cryptographic_signature_ver
Hello there!
Onsdag den 7:e december 2016, klockan 15:56, skrev Gianfranco Costamagna detta:
> >
> >+ debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp: New file.
> >+ debian/source/include-binaries: New file.
>
> please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries
> file?
Then I
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor of the package "rush":
>
>+ debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp: New file.
>+ debian/source/include-binaries: New file.
please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries
file?
G.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor of the package "rush":
Package name: rush
Version : 1.8+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff
URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/projects/rush/
License : GPL-3+
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:12:51 + (UTC)
with message-id <682002211.2270956.1460455971355.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#820739: RFS: rush/1.7+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #820739,
regarding RFS: rush/1.7+dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
This
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor of the package "rush"
Package name: rush
Version : 1.7+dfsg-5
Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff
URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/projects/rush/
License : GPL-3+
S
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:55:10PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Hi Mats,
> if a repackaging in order to circumvent GFDL-1.3 is not
> enough for you to proceed, then nothing will ever satisfy
> your desires. Still, I send a further reminder.
I just started to look at your package and I'm not
Dear mentors,
if a repackaging in order to circumvent GFDL-1.3 is not
enough for you to proceed, then nothing will ever satisfy
your desires. Still, I send a further reminder.
måndag den 18 april 2011 klockan 16:16 skrev Mats Erik Andersson detta:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor o
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor of the package "rush".
The upstream source had to be repackaged due to
an issue with GFDL-1.3. The Texinfo source has
been removed in order to get the software itself
into "main", but I had compiled manual pages already.
Package name: rush
Versio
tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 19:32 skrev Laszlo Boszormenyi detta:
> On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:47 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Anyway, I have modified the watch file to use HTTP instead of FTP.
> > The new package has been uploaded to mentors.debian.net and it
> > awaits f
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:47 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 15:05 skrev Jonathan Wiltshire detta:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > However the
> > > watch file doesn't work behind my firewall. The best would be if
2010/12/21, Mats Erik Andersson :
> tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 18:46 skrev Lars Buitinck detta:
>> 2010/12/21, Mats Erik Andersson :
>> Maybe nitpicking here, but wouldn't it be wiser to use
>> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rush/ as the url? When I saw
>> gnu.org.ua, the first thing I d
tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 18:46 skrev Lars Buitinck detta:
> 2010/12/21, Mats Erik Andersson :
> > Anyway, I have modified the watch file to use HTTP instead of FTP.
> > The new package has been uploaded to mentors.debian.net and it
> > awaits further critisism.
>
> Maybe nitpicking here
2010/12/21, Mats Erik Andersson :
> Anyway, I have modified the watch file to use HTTP instead of FTP.
> The new package has been uploaded to mentors.debian.net and it
> awaits further critisism.
Maybe nitpicking here, but wouldn't it be wiser to use
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rush/ as the u
tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 15:05 skrev Jonathan Wiltshire detta:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > I can only second that the package is in a good shape. However the
> > watch file doesn't work behind my firewall. The best would be if you add
> > th
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> I can only second that the package is in a good shape. However the
> watch file doesn't work behind my firewall. The best would be if you add
> the passive option to it. I'll upload this package then.
Passive mode should not be
Hi Mats Erik,
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 14:20 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> The package is pedantically lintian clean and builds in
> pbuilder for testing as well as for unstable.
[...]
> I would please me if someone looked at this package and reported
> conclusions on the packaging.
I can only
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rush".
This is possibly my last effort to find a sponsor,
then it will go back to RFP.
Moved rush.1 to rushd.8 in comparison to previous upload.
Package name: rush
Version: 1.7-1
Upstream author: Sergey Poznyakoff
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rush".
Package name: rush
Version: 1.7-1
Upstream author: Sergey Poznyakoff
URL: http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/projects/rush/
License: GPL-3
Section: shells
It builds these binary
söndag den 13 juni 2010 klockan 01:46 skrev Tim Retout detta:
> On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson
> wrote:
> > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
>
> I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the
This pleases me!
> project) shall have to discuss the
On 13 June 2010 12:47, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * George Danchev [100613 09:33]:
>> * the easy part: there is nothing wrong for non-DD to ask in advance if there
>> are interested sponsor(s) of the piece of software they intend to package or
>> adopt, especially with large and complex pieces. Th
* George Danchev [100613 09:33]:
> * the easy part: there is nothing wrong for non-DD to ask in advance if there
> are interested sponsor(s) of the piece of software they intend to package or
> adopt, especially with large and complex pieces. That would avoid wasting
> their time.
I don't know ab
Tim Retout writes:
> On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson
wrote:
> > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
>
> I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the
> project) shall have to discuss the sponsoring situation.
I will not be attending debconf10, but h
On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the
project) shall have to discuss the sponsoring situation.
> In comparison to the first packaging attempt, the Debian
> specific
On 4 June 2010 12:12, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> fredag den 4 juni 2010 klockan 20:58 skrev Ben Finney detta:
>> Mats Erik Andersson writes:
>>
>> > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
>>
>> What distinction are you drawing with that qualifier (???__active__???)?
>> What are y
Mats Erik Andersson writes:
> Well, I had one in the mid of April, he made a quick look, made an
> excuse for making it superficial, and have not been heard of since for
> this package, or for windowlab, which he also accepted.
There may be a misconception, then. A sponsor only has a commitment
fredag den 4 juni 2010 klockan 20:58 skrev Ben Finney detta:
> Mats Erik Andersson writes:
>
> > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
>
> What distinction are you drawing with that qualifier (???__active__???)?
> What are you seeking beyond a sponsor for the package?
Well, I ha
Mats Erik Andersson writes:
> I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
What distinction are you drawing with that qualifier (“__active__”)?
What are you seeking beyond a sponsor for the package?
--
\“The whole area of [treating source code as intellectual |
`\pro
Dear mentors,
I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
In comparison to the first packaging attempt, the Debian
specific documentation has been expanded, in particular
concerning chrooted service access, and a helper program
'mkchroot-rush.pl' has been included in order to ease the
po
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rush".
* Package name: rush
Version : 1.6-1
Upstream author: Sergey Poznyakoff
URL: http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/projects/rush/
License: GPL-3
Section : shells
It builds these binary pack
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package looks good otherwise, you might want to get the Debian ruby
> > people to take a look:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/
>
> Judging from their archives, it seems to be unusual to get packages
>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:18:45AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the first revision of my "rush"
> > package. The source package can be downloaded from:
> Have you sent the patches and
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the first revision of my "rush"
> package. The source package can be downloaded from:
I don't know ruby, here are some comments:
Have you sent the patches and manual pages to upst
Hi, mentors,
I’m looking for a sponsor to upload the first revision of my “rush”
package. The source package can be downloaded from:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rush/rush_0.2-1.dsc
Version:0.2-1
Upstream: Adam Wiggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
52 matches
Mail list logo
