Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 23:37:04 +0800 Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > Tony Houghton writes: > > >> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". > > Done. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:26:51 +0100 > Tony Houghton wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:59:04 +0100 >> Tony Houghton wrote: >> >> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". >> > >> > * Package name: roxterm >> >Version : 2.2.1-1 >> >> Hold tha

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:26:51 +0100 Tony Houghton wrote: > On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:59:04 +0100 > Tony Houghton wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". > > > > * Package name: roxterm > >Version : 2.2.1-1 > > Hold that, I discovered corruption in the GtkB

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:59:04 +0100 Tony Houghton wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". > > * Package name: roxterm >Version : 2.2.1-1 Hold that, I discovered corruption in the GtkBuilder definitions after release (looks like vi finger trouble!) so I'll ha

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". * Package name: roxterm Version : 2.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Tony Houghton * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2+ Section : x11 It builds those binary package

Re: Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))

On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:45:48 +0200 Arno Töll wrote: > No need to do. I already fixed that a few days ago [1]. However I didn't > merge our master branch to live (i.e. the deployment branch) yet. OK. Please post again when you do so I know when I can try again to upload roxterm. -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Arno Töll wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > >> This is certainly a bug. You can file bugs against the debexpo project >> on Alioth: > > No need to do. I already fixed that a few days ago [1]. However I didn't > merge our master branch to l

Re: Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > This is certainly a bug. You can file bugs against the debexpo project > on Alioth: No need to do. I already fixed that a few days ago [1]. However I didn't merge our master branch to live (i.e. the deployment branch) yet. [1] http://anonscm.debia

Re: Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:28:19 +0100 > Tony Houghton wrote: > >> I think releasing to experimental would be the best option at the >> moment, so I'll upload a new version later. > > I tried that and my package was rejected by m.d.n: > > You ar

Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))

On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:28:19 +0100 Tony Houghton wrote: > I think releasing to experimental would be the best option at the > moment, so I'll upload a new version later. I tried that and my package was rejected by m.d.n: You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions: unstablestabl

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:44:03 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Kan-Ru Chen , 2011-09-14, 11:29: > >> > >>That is, more or less, what's happening, so I'll move the bug to > >>libvte9. In case that takes a long time to fix should I manually > >>override the dependency? > > > >Yes you can, just put the

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

* Kan-Ru Chen , 2011-09-14, 11:29: [Please always Cc me] [Done] ${shlibs:Depends} should be set by debhelper to the minimum version required by this package upon version information from the library at build time. If you are using a feature that is only available after libvte9 1:0.28.1-2 but

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > [Note: I'm not sure whether I should remove the personal addresses from > To/Cc, especially in George's case. Please let me know what you'd > prefer. I'm subscribed to the list so I don't need the Cc, but I'm not > bothered about receiving extra copies either.] [Please al

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

[Note: I'm not sure whether I should remove the personal addresses from To/Cc, especially in George's case. Please let me know what you'd prefer. I'm subscribed to the list so I don't need the Cc, but I'm not bothered about receiving extra copies either.] On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:23:05 +0800 Kan-Ru

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:36:54 +0800 > Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > >> Hi Tony, >> >> You sure you want to upload to unstable, right? Asking because it was >> previously uploaded to experimental. > > I think so, yes. I didn't really intend to send the previous version to > experim

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:36:54 +0800 Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > Hi Tony, > > You sure you want to upload to unstable, right? Asking because it was > previously uploaded to experimental. I think so, yes. I didn't really intend to send the previous version to experimental and wanted to go back to unstabl

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Hi Tony, You sure you want to upload to unstable, right? Asking because it was previously uploaded to experimental. -- Kanru -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". * Package name: roxterm Version : 2.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Tony Houghton * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-3+ Section : x11 It builds these binary packages

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:47:15 +0800 Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > Tony Houghton writes: > > > Yes, this is a known bug (#632403) and that's the main reason I'm still > > providing a gtk2 package too. As soon as it's uploaded I'll mark the > > bug as affecting roxterm-gtk3. I should probably have mentione

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:12:30 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > Does roxterm-gtk3 have any functionality -gtk2 doesn't have? Unlike > QT/GTK, there isn't a big difference there and I quite fail to see > the reason to have both. It's a library rather than support for a > whole environment, you need to

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:50:46 +0800 > Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > >> Only one problem when I tested the package. The gtk3 version, the >> terminal window shrinks its width when I try to move it around. I don't >> know if it's because of my window manager (awesome) or it also appe

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 04:16:02PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:50:46 +0800 > Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > > Only one problem when I tested the package. The gtk3 version, the > > terminal window shrinks its width when I try to move it around. I don't > > know if it's because of

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:50:46 +0800 Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > Only one problem when I tested the package. The gtk3 version, the > terminal window shrinks its width when I try to move it around. I don't > know if it's because of my window manager (awesome) or it also appears > on other environment. If y

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". * Package name: roxterm Version : 2.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Tony Houghton * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-3 Section : x11 To access further information

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:55:55 +0300 George Danchev wrote: > Uploaded, thanks for your work. Thanks. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Thursday, June 23, 2011 07:33:58 PM Tony Houghton wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.22.2-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clea

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.22.2-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. This release is to fix a bug with compositing/colormaps. See:

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:25:40 +0300 George Danchev wrote: > On Thursday 02 June 2011 16:38:00 Tony Houghton wrote: > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.22.1-1 > > of my package "roxterm". > > Uploaded. Thanks for taking care of the bugs. Thanks for uploading so quickly. sig

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Thursday 02 June 2011 16:38:00 Tony Houghton wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.22.1-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. >

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.22.1-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. Amongst other things this version fixes a bug which, although unreported,

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21.4-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debi

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Tony Houghton wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. I'll take a look in one/two days. Ping me if I've not replied in this time frame. > My last few RFSs have been overlooked. Is there anything I can do to > improve my RFS messages? Sh

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21.3-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debi

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Tony Houghton wrote: > Experimental has 1.20.7-1 (again because of the freeze). Will that > automatically disappear when a newer version appears in unstable? Yes. -- Kartik Mistry Debian GNU/Linux Developer IRC: kart_ | Identica: @kartikm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21.2-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debi

RFS: roxterm (updated package, 2nd try)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21.1-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debi

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21.1-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debi

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

On 01/22/2011 09:50 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: Thanks. Thank you for the updates, Tony. I've been happily using the i386 experimental build for the last several days. Two custom profile configs "Just Work" on upgrade from the squeeze version. -- Kind regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 19:58:13 +0800 Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > Uploaded. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110122155059.06c9012b@toddler

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

Tony Houghton writes: > On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:26:43 +0800 > Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > >> OK. When I was doing the final test, roxterm existed immediately after >> launch. 1.18.5-3, however, has no such problem. I suspect it's only my >> environment, x86_64-linux-gnu. Do you have any clue? > > Kan-Ru

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:26:43 +0800 Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > OK. When I was doing the final test, roxterm existed immediately after > launch. 1.18.5-3, however, has no such problem. I suspect it's only my > environment, x86_64-linux-gnu. Do you have any clue? Kan-Ru Chen helped me identify what was c

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

I've filed a bug against vte upstream which you may want to subscribe to. I don't know if they'll take much notice, because the affected vte function is deprecated and I think its replacement is OK, but somebody there might know what's going on.

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

Tony Houghton writes: > PS Is this now OT for the list and I should stop Cc'ing it? OK. Let's take this off list. -- A badly written book is only a blunder. A bad translation of a good book is a crime. -- Gilbert Highet -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@list

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:26:43 +0800 Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > OK. When I was doing the final test, roxterm existed immediately after > launch. 1.18.5-3, however, has no such problem. I suspect it's only my > environment, x86_64-linux-gnu. Do you have any clue? I can reproduce this with zsh and nano, b

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

Tony Houghton writes: > On 15/01/11 16:51, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: >> Tony Houghton writes: >> >>> On 15/01/11 08:26, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: OK. When I was doing the final test, roxterm existed immediately after launch. 1.18.5-3, however, has no such problem. I suspect it's only my environ

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

On 15/01/11 16:51, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: Tony Houghton writes: On 15/01/11 08:26, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: OK. When I was doing the final test, roxterm existed immediately after launch. 1.18.5-3, however, has no such problem. I suspect it's only my environment, x86_64-linux-gnu. Do you have any clue?

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

Tony Houghton writes: > On 15/01/11 08:26, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: >> OK. When I was doing the final test, roxterm existed immediately after >> launch. 1.18.5-3, however, has no such problem. I suspect it's only my >> environment, x86_64-linux-gnu. Do you have any clue? > > Can you rebuild it without

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

On 15/01/11 08:26, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: OK. When I was doing the final test, roxterm existed immediately after launch. 1.18.5-3, however, has no such problem. I suspect it's only my environment, x86_64-linux-gnu. Do you have any clue? Can you rebuild it without the debugging symbols being strippe

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

Tony Houghton writes: > On 14/01/11 02:49, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: >> Tony Houghton writes: >>> I found some build issues in the mean time, although most of them didn't >>> affect Debian, so I've upgraded the upstream version as well as merged >>> the problem changelog entries. >> >> Builds fine here

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

On 14/01/11 02:49, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: Hi! Tony Houghton writes: Please could you check the latest version: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

Tony Houghton writes: > On 10/01/11 13:57, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: ... >> Apparently only the 1.18.5-3 is currently in sid. Debdiff also >> indicates the other entries are newly introduced. > > 1.18.5-3 was released chronologically after 1.19.1-1 (although that > technically wasn't released in Debian

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

On 10/01/11 13:57, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: I downloaded the package from mentors.d.o, the most recent 6 changelog entries are: roxterm (1.20.3-1) experimental; urgency=low roxterm (1.19.4-1) unstable; urgency=low roxterm (1.19.3-1) unstable; urgency=low roxterm (1.19.2-1) unstable

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

Tony Houghton writes: > On 09/01/11 14:45, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Tony Houghton writes: >> >>> I RFSd 1.20.1-1 about a week ago but it was overlooked and I received >>> a patch this weekend so instead of pinging my previous RFS I created a >>> new version and merged the debian/chang

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

On 09/01/11 14:45, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: Hi, Tony Houghton writes: I RFSd 1.20.1-1 about a week ago but it was overlooked and I received a patch this weekend so instead of pinging my previous RFS I created a new version and merged the debian/changelog entries for 1.20.1-1 through 1.20.3-1 as

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

Hi, Tony Houghton writes: >I RFSd 1.20.1-1 about a week ago but it was overlooked and I received > a patch this weekend so instead of pinging my previous RFS I created a > new version and merged the debian/changelog entries for 1.20.1-1 through > 1.20.3-1 as the earlier 1.20.* versions were

RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.20.3-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 601828 The package can be found on ment

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package) [highly configurable terminal emulator]

Dear Tony, On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote: > On 12/10/10 00:50, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > > > I'll take this. The change seems minimal, so I'll sponsor it. Please > > be sure to request the release team for a freeze exception. > > Thanks. I've sent a message to debi

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package) [highly configurable terminal emulator]

On 12/10/10 00:50, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > I'll take this. The change seems minimal, so I'll sponsor it. Please > be sure to request the release team for a freeze exception. Thanks. I've sent a message to debian-release. I don't fully understand the freeze exception process. I see you already u

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package) [highly configurable terminal emulator]

Hi! On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:37:49PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote: > The upload would fix these bugs: 598971 > > The bug can affect which environment variables roxterm decides to set or > change in its child shells. The specific problem experienced in Ubuntu > Maverick (not setting TERM correctly

RFS: roxterm (updated package) [highly configurable terminal emulator]

Dear mentors, My first RFS for this version didn't result in an upload so I am still looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.5-3 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The uplo

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On 04/10/10 13:43, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > > For anyone reading -- it's a bug where a terminal emulator isn't setting > TERM properly. Kind of depressing, and kind of important! It's also > basically a one line change. > > Also, as advice for the future, it would have been nice if you had said >

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Tony Houghton wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.5-3 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bug

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.5-3 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 598971 I think the bug is potentially se

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.5-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bug

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.5-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 589871 The package can be found on mento

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:23:46 +0300 Hi, > George Danchev wrote: > > Tony Houghton writes: > > > However, due to a bug which can cause roxterm to crash unpredictably > > > (very serious because it can take any number of child processes with > > > it), discussed at > > >

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:23:46 +0300 George Danchev wrote: > Tony Houghton writes: > > However, due to a bug which can cause roxterm to crash unpredictably > > (very serious because it can take any number of child processes with > > it), discussed at > >

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.4-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The package can be found on

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.4-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debi

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:55:59 +0300 George Danchev wrote: > Ops, apparently I forgot to reply to that (i.e. previous) mail for > some reason a week ago, sorry about that. I had a look at the src > diff against the version in sid, got lost into that, and decided that > large change like that to fix

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:06:40 +0300 Hi, > George Danchev wrote: > > Tony Houghton writes: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.3-1 > > > of my package "roxterm". > > > > > > It builds these binary packages: > > > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE ter

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:06:40 +0300 George Danchev wrote: > Tony Houghton writes: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.3-1 > > of my package "roxterm". > > > > It builds these binary packages: > > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > > > The package appea

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:06:40 +0300 George Danchev wrote: > Tony Houghton writes: > > > > When I released the previous version I was contacted by a DD offering to > > sponsor roxterm and help me become a DM, but when I told him George > > Danchev had already uploaded it he said I didn't need his

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.3-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The package can be found on

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.3-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debi

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.18.2-1.dsc Uploaded. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.2-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. It fixes these upstream bugs:

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:00:11 +0200 George Danchev wrote: > Tony Houghton writes: > > Dear mentors, > > Hi, > (excuse moi for the delay) > > > It doesn't fix any Debian bugs, but it addresses an Ubuntu LP feature > > request and several upstream feature requests and bugs. > > > http://mentors.

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, (excuse moi for the delay) > It doesn't fix any Debian bugs, but it addresses an Ubuntu LP feature > request and several upstream feature requests and bugs. > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.18.1-1.dsc Uploaded. Thanks.

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.18.1-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. It doesn't fix any Debian bugs, but it addresses an Ubuntu LP feature requ

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 23:44:40 +0200 > > George Danchev wrote: > > I decided to test the new option as mentioned in the changelog "Added > > always_show_tabs option", however I got lost in how the user is > > supposed to change that option, since it is neither command line no

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 23:44:40 +0200 George Danchev wrote: > I decided to test the new option as mentioned in the changelog "Added > always_show_tabs option", however I got lost in how the user is > supposed to change that option, since it is neither command line nor > menu one. Sure, I can stop the

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Tony Houghton writes: > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.17.1-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The package can be found o

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.17.1-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debi

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16.3-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > The upload would fix these bugs: 559126 > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.16.3-1.dsc Uploaded. Thank you. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB signature.asc Descr

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16.3-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 559126 The package can be found on mento

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:53:09 +0200 --cut-- > > Adding autotools-dev back to build-dependencies fixes it, > > OK, I've added that dependency back. I've duploaded a replacement, but I > haven't changed the version number because I think it's better not to > when it hasn't been released yet. This

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:53:09 +0200 George Danchev wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:39:25 +0200 > > > > George Danchev wrote: > > > Package looks good and 557049 seems to be addressed as well, at least > > > works for me;-). JFYI I just run into some leftovers in the roxterm(1) > > > and roxter

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:39:25 +0200 > > George Danchev wrote: > > Package looks good and 557049 seems to be addressed as well, at least > > works for me;-). JFYI I just run into some leftovers in the roxterm(1) > > and roxterm- config(1) manpages -- they both contain [FIXME: manual] > > and [FIX

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:39:25 +0200 George Danchev wrote: > Package looks good and 557049 seems to be addressed as well, at least > works for me;-). JFYI I just run into some leftovers in the roxterm(1) > and roxterm- config(1) manpages -- they both contain [FIXME: manual] > and [FIXME: source], a

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

> Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16.1-1 > of my package "roxterm". > > It builds these binary packages: > roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 557049 > > The

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16.1-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 557049 The package can be found on mento

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.0-1 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- multi-tabbed GTK+2 terminal emulator application The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 435984, 435989, 436158 The pack

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On 8/2/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:00:15PM +0300, Thierry Randrianiriana wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.2-2 > > of my package "roxterm". > > Uploaded. > Thanks -- Thierry Randrianiriana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:00:15PM +0300, Thierry Randrianiriana wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.2-2 > of my package "roxterm". Uploaded. Christoph -- Peer review means that you can feel better because someone else missed the problem, too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

RFS: roxterm (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.2-2 of my package "roxterm". It builds these binary packages: roxterm- multi-tabbed GTK+2 terminal emulator application The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 435475 The package can be found