On 09/01/11 14:45, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
Hi,

Tony Houghton<h...@realh.co.uk>  writes:

    I RFSd 1.20.1-1 about a week ago but it was overlooked and I received
a patch this weekend so instead of pinging my previous RFS I created a
new version and merged the debian/changelog entries for 1.20.1-1 through
1.20.3-1 as the earlier 1.20.* versions were not released. The latest
version is to ensure that the package doesn't require po4a to build from
a release tarball.

I was checking this package.  I found that the changelog entries seem
messed up, in a way that old entries and new entries are mixed together.

Please tidy up the changelogs then I will upload it.

Do you mean the Debian changelog or upstream? I can't see a problem with
either, please could you show an example of where entries have been
mixed up.

--
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d2adcfa.6060...@realh.co.uk

Reply via email to