Hello all,
2007/2/6, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Filename: pool/non-free/l/latex2html/latex2html_2002-2-1-20050114-5_all.deb
^
What is happening to a source package with build-dependancies on a
non-free package. Can it produce a binary packages for main, with only
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
What is happening to a source package with build-dependancies on a
non-free package. Can it produce a binary packages for main, with only a
-doc package going in contrib? Do the Debian buildds have non-free
enabled? (I doubt...)
It is quite a sloppy is
Hello,
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
> $ apt-cache show latex2html
> Package: latex2html
> Priority: optional
> Section: non-free/tex
There are alternatives like "hevea" and "tex4ht". Both of them work
on "generic" LaTeX documents. Unusual uses of latex may require fine
tuning to get
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:19:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> indeed, I just noticed the following :
>
> sorbet???~???$ apt-cache show latex2html
> Filename: pool/non-free/l/latex2html/latex2html_2002-2-1-20050114-5_all.deb
> ^
> Do you think that there are other converters a
Le Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:33:17AM +0800, Changyan Xie a écrit :
>
> Dear Andreas:
> Ok, I admit that the real problem is that the dependence to latex2html
Dear all,
indeed, I just noticed the following :
sorbet【~】$ apt-cache show latex2html
Package: latex2html
Priority: optional
Section: non-f
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Changyan Xie wrote:
Ok, I admit that the real problem is that the dependence to latex2html
require tetex-extra and a lot of other packages,and after this
additional dependence, my system require another 100 M disk space.
If it is about bloating your production system I woul
Dear Andreas:
Ok, I admit that the real problem is that the dependence to latex2html
require tetex-extra and a lot of other packages,and after this
additional dependence, my system require another 100 M disk space. I
don't like installing a lot of packages just because an unnecessary
package. I be
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Changyan Xie wrote:
I have looked over all the patch stuff! Your work are excellent!
But I have a little opinion on the libsbml-doc package and the build
dependence to latex2html: the upstream offer a seperated libsbml-doc
source package,which contained compiled html
Hi Moriyoshi:
I have looked over all the patch stuff! Your work are excellent!
But I have a little opinion on the libsbml-doc package and the build
dependence to latex2html: the upstream offer a seperated libsbml-doc
source package,which contained compiled html and pdf document. So, why
not
Hello Panchoat,
I was finally managed to merge your effort with my stuff.
Please look at the following diff:
http://voltex.jp/downloads/libsbml_2.3.4-2.diff.gz
Regarding the gcj issue, I forgot to mention that I actually patched
to java.m4 to get it to work :) My apologies for that.
Thanks,
Mo
Dear Moriyoshi:
I correct the description and the gcc-3.4 dependence problems, and
upload the packages to mentors.debian.net ftp site. In these days, I try
to build them by libgcj7-dev and gcj-4.1, but I failed, can you show
your patch for successfully building the package with gcj?
Dear Moriyoshi:
What a coincidence! Maybe it is just because the number of sbml users
is larger and larger. :-)
I have try to use gcj-4.1 and free-java-sdk, but It always fail to
build. The potential cause may be the swig version or anything else, but
I didn't try to patch it. In t
Dear Moriyoshi,
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 08:37:55 Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Just a side note: I'm a full-time scientific programmer at the Keio
> University, working specifically on the E-Cell project
> (http://www.e-cell.org/ ) that aims to create a versatile in-silico
> simulator and related
Hello there,
Just a side note: I'm a full-time scientific programmer at the Keio
University, working specifically on the E-Cell project
(http://www.e-cell.org/ ) that aims to create a versatile in-silico
simulator and related toolkits.
2007/1/29, Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear Chang
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Dear Moriyoshi and dear Changyan, please get in contact with each other for an
exchange of ideas for the package. Whoever wishes to go forward with the
maintenance should do so. A SVN-based group maintenance would be preferable
from my point of view as
Dear Changyan (also, please correct/apologize if I address you wrongly),
dear Charles,
this is quite a coincidence.
The SBML libraries have two rather ancient ITPs (#24,#277748) of mine and
Andrea Tasso. Just last week I got a patch to my diff.gz. thus bringing it
up to the latest level,
Le Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 05:00:54PM +0800, Panchoat a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsbml".
>
> * Package name: libsbml
> Version : 2.3.4-1
> Upstream Author : The sbml team mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : www.sbml.org
> * L
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsbml".
* Package name: libsbml
Version : 2.3.4-1
Upstream Author : The sbml team mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : www.sbml.org
* License : GPL
Section : contrib/science(because to compile the
18 matches
Mail list logo
