Le Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:33:17AM +0800, Changyan Xie a écrit :
>
> Dear Andreas:
> Ok, I admit that the real problem is that the dependence to latex2html
Dear all,
indeed, I just noticed the following :
sorbet【~】$ apt-cache show latex2html
Package: latex2html
Priority: optional
Section: non-free/tex
Installed-Size: 7128
Maintainer: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Version: 2002-2-1-20050114-5
Depends: perl, netpbm (>= 2:9.20), gs, tetex-bin (>= 1.0.7+20001218) |
texlive-base-bin, tetex-extra | texlive-latex-recommended, tetex-extra |
texlive-fonts-recommended, perl-doc
Conflicts: tetex-base (<< 0.9.990311-2)
Filename: pool/non-free/l/latex2html/latex2html_2002-2-1-20050114-5_all.deb
^^^^^^^^^
What is happening to a source package with build-dependancies on a
non-free package. Can it produce a binary packages for main, with only a
-doc package going in contrib? Do the Debian buildds have non-free
enabled? (I doubt...)
Do you think that there are other converters around which can to the
same job ?
If we decide to keep latex2html, maybe we can try to add
texlive-latex-recommended and texlive-fonts-recommended to the
build-dependancies, so that it would avoid to use tetex-extra?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
http://charles.plessy.org
Wako, Saitama, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
