On 07/12/2011 03:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> Anyway, I looked into unstable and patched /usr/lib/libxmlsec1*.la
> temporarily, which means clearing dependency_libs.
>
> Unfortunately, this doesn't help. Libtool (ld) still links libgeier
> against all the (unnecessary) libs as before. dpkg-shlib
Andreas Moog writes:
> On 07/11/2011 10:03 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>> Andreas Moog writes:
>>
>>> On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>>>
> I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
> dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
>
On 07/11/2011 10:03 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
Andreas Moog writes:
On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt (whic
Andreas Moog writes:
> On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
>>> I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
>>> dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
>>> http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt (which is linked from
>>> http://lists.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Andreas Moog wrote:
> Is it really considered necessary to override a wishlist/--pedantic
> lintian tag?
Definitely not.
It also is not correct to override lintian when it is correct.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>> I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
>> dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
>> http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt (which is linked from
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/0
On 07/11/2011 09:12 PM, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
>>> So overwrite it.
>>
>> I don't understand that. What do you mean with overwrite it?
>
> You create a file debian/libgeier-dev.lintian-overrides with the line:
> libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
>
> and a file debian/libgeier0.lintian-override
Olaf Dietsche wrote on
2011-07-11 20:17:
> > So overwrite it.
>
> I don't understand that. What do you mean with overwrite it?
You create a file debian/libgeier-dev.lintian-overrides with the line:
libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
and a file debian/libgeier0.lintian-overrides with the line:
Uwe Kleine-König writes:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>>
>> > P: libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
>> > P: libgeier0: no-upstream-changelog
>>
>> Doesn't make sense, since upstream changelog is empty.
> So overwrite it.
I don't understand that. What do y
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> Paul Wise writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> >
> >> The package appears to be lintian clean.
> >
> > Not really:
> >
> > I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
> > W: libgeier sour
Paul Wise writes:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> Not really:
>
> I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
> W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
> W: libgeier source: debian-rules-m
Paul Wise writes:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> Not really:
>
> I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
> W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
> W: libgeier source: debian-rules-m
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 22:53 +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> So, where do these other warnings come from?
From my bash configuration:
alias lintian='lintian --info --display-info --display-experimental --pedantic
--show-overrides --checksums --color auto'
And always use the latest lintian from si
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
Not really:
I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-in
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12-0.1
of my package "libgeier".
It builds these binary packages:
libgeier-dev - Development files for the libgeier library
libgeier0 - Elster client library (German tax declarations)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The pa
15 matches
Mail list logo
