Hello, On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote: > Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote: > > > >> The package appears to be lintian clean. > > > > Not really: > > > > I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format > > W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch > > W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep > > Fixed in 0.12-0.2 > > > P: libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog > > P: libgeier0: no-upstream-changelog > > Doesn't make sense, since upstream changelog is empty. So overwrite it.
> > E: libgeier-dev: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file usr/lib/libgeier.la > > AFAICT, this comes from depending on xmlsec1, which itself depends on > these libraries. I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt (which is linked from http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg01003.html) xmlsec1 is OK, so you should really clean this entry in your libgeier.la. > > I: libgeier0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libgeier.so.0.0.0 > > Won't fix: Severity: wishlist > > I also won't fix upstream warnings, since I think this is a separate > issue. IMHO this should be done for all serious library packages. If upstream doesn't care for API stability it's hardly possible, but having a symbols file is really worthwile. Best regards Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110711134624.ga2...@strlen.de
