Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I disagree that its cleaner, but I think that the decreased cleanliness
> is worth the increased error checking granularity.
Yeah, cleaner was perhaps not the best term to use. :) It's actually an
odd abuse of make features.
> See #325372 and twins f
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 02:16:48PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jonas Genannt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am searching for an sponsor for my libaudio-mixer-perl package.
> Uploaded.
> * The make clean target has:
>
>-$(MAKE) realclean
>
>As previously mentioned, I think:
>
Jonas Genannt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am searching for an sponsor for my libaudio-mixer-perl package.
> * Package name: libaudio-mixer-perl
> Version : 0.7
> Upstream Author : Sergey Gribov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~sergey
> * Licens
Hello,
I am searching for an sponsor for my libaudio-mixer-perl package.
* Package name: libaudio-mixer-perl
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Sergey Gribov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~sergey
* License : GPL / Artistic
Description :
4 matches
Mail list logo