Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I disagree that its cleaner, but I think that the decreased cleanliness > is worth the increased error checking granularity.
Yeah, cleaner was perhaps not the best term to use. :) It's actually an odd abuse of make features. > See #325372 and twins for the discussion, including the one line > solution suggested by vorlon: > [ ! -f Makefile ] || make clean This is certainly also fine, and has the advantage of being shorter. > One of these will likely be implemented in future dh_make templates, > and -make clean will likely cause a lintian warning/error. Yeah, I should go provide a patch for that to lintian, since I keep noticing it. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
