Xavier Antoviaque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I read the policy, and I know about this script. But the problem is
> that byte-compilation is specific to a version of Python, and I was
> trying to package leo for both 2.2 and 2.3. It seems, from what I have
> read since my last post, that the
Xavier Antoviaque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I read the policy, and I know about this script. But the problem is
> that byte-compilation is specific to a version of Python, and I was
> trying to package leo for both 2.2 and 2.3. It seems, from what I have
> read since my last post, that the
On Wed, 26 May 2004 12:46:44 +0200
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /usr/share/doc/python/python-policy.*
> Without dh_python, byte-compilation is usually done with
> /usr/lib/python$PV/compileall.py.
Yes, I read the policy, and I know about this script. But the problem is
that byte
On Wed, 26 May 2004 12:46:44 +0200
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /usr/share/doc/python/python-policy.*
> Without dh_python, byte-compilation is usually done with
> /usr/lib/python$PV/compileall.py.
Yes, I read the policy, and I know about this script. But the problem is
that byte
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, upon installation you should somehow create precompiled python
> files (*.pyc). I don't know python myself, but there must be some
> preferred way to do so, iirc there is a (unofficial?) python policy.
Right. I would not say it is unofficia
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, upon installation you should somehow create precompiled python
> files (*.pyc). I don't know python myself, but there must be some
> preferred way to do so, iirc there is a (unofficial?) python policy.
Right. I would not say it is unofficia
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 12:24:16AM +0200, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before
> > leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved a
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before
> leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved anyway
Thanks for your reply, its helps a lot.
I repackaged leo, I hope it s
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 12:24:16AM +0200, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before
> > leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved a
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before
> leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved anyway
Thanks for your reply, its helps a lot.
I repackaged leo, I hope it s
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:08:51PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago.
> >
> > Package name: leo
> > Version : 3.10
> > License
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago.
>
> Package name: leo
> Version : 3.10
> License : Python licence
> Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Upst
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:08:51PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago.
> >
> > Package name: leo
> > Version : 3.10
> > License
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago.
>
> Package name: leo
> Version : 3.10
> License : Python licence
> Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Upst
Hello,
I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago.
Package name: leo
Version : 3.10
License : Python licence
Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Upstream URL: http://personalpages.tds.net/~edream/front.html
Package URL : http:
Hello,
I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago.
Package name: leo
Version : 3.10
License : Python licence
Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Upstream URL: http://personalpages.tds.net/~edream/front.html
Package URL : http:
16 matches
Mail list logo
