On Sunday 29 August 2004 14:37, Mark Hymers wrote:
> I think the package is ready for upload now. I've made a few changes
> since the last version you saw.
> Also, our local server at work has died (and I haven't had a chance
> to look at it yet as it's the weekend) so I've uploaded the source
>
On Sunday 29 August 2004 14:37, Mark Hymers wrote:
> I think the package is ready for upload now. I've made a few changes
> since the last version you saw.
> Also, our local server at work has died (and I haven't had a chance
> to look at it yet as it's the weekend) so I've uploaded the source
>
On Fri, 27, Aug, 2004 at 06:49:47AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke thus..
> Sounds good; posts the links to your packages when you feel that they're
> ready and I'll take a look at them. Unfortunately, like a quantum
> particle, I'll be popping in and out of existance this week, but I
> should h
On Fri, 27, Aug, 2004 at 06:49:47AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke thus..
> Sounds good; posts the links to your packages when you feel that they're
> ready and I'll take a look at them. Unfortunately, like a quantum
> particle, I'll be popping in and out of existance this week, but I
> should h
On Fri, 27, Aug, 2004 at 02:44:27PM +0200, Andreas Metzler spoke thus..
> No, that is useless. - It does not change a thing.
>
> The buildds do not automatically evaluate Build-Depends before they
> download and try to build the package. They download the package,
> install build-dependcies (ignor
On Friday 27 August 2004 06:35, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Sun, 22, Aug, 2004 at 09:48:17AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke
> thus..
>
> > I'm willing to sponsor it once I can get it to build cleanly. That
> > might mean waiting a bit for some of the kde dependancies to
> > trickle into unstable, but i
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:35:34PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
[...]
> There is a KDE NMU in incoming at the moment which fixes the libopenexr
> issue. Could you offer me one piece of advice? Should I make the
> Build-Depends on kdelibs4 versioned (i.e. kdelibs4 (>> 3.3.0-1.1)) to
> make sure buil
On Sun, 22, Aug, 2004 at 09:48:17AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke thus..
> I'm willing to sponsor it once I can get it to build cleanly. That might
> mean waiting a bit for some of the kde dependancies to trickle into
> unstable, but if you drop me a reminder to try again, I'll give it
> anothe
On Fri, 27, Aug, 2004 at 02:44:27PM +0200, Andreas Metzler spoke thus..
> No, that is useless. - It does not change a thing.
>
> The buildds do not automatically evaluate Build-Depends before they
> download and try to build the package. They download the package,
> install build-dependcies (ignor
On Friday 27 August 2004 06:35, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Sun, 22, Aug, 2004 at 09:48:17AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke
> thus..
>
> > I'm willing to sponsor it once I can get it to build cleanly. That
> > might mean waiting a bit for some of the kde dependancies to
> > trickle into unstable, but i
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:35:34PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
[...]
> There is a KDE NMU in incoming at the moment which fixes the libopenexr
> issue. Could you offer me one piece of advice? Should I make the
> Build-Depends on kdelibs4 versioned (i.e. kdelibs4 (>> 3.3.0-1.1)) to
> make sure buil
On Sun, 22, Aug, 2004 at 09:48:17AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke thus..
> I'm willing to sponsor it once I can get it to build cleanly. That might
> mean waiting a bit for some of the kde dependancies to trickle into
> unstable, but if you drop me a reminder to try again, I'll give it
> anothe
On Tue, 24, Aug, 2004 at 01:51:40PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar spoke thus..
> Include the upstream homepage in the description in debian/control.
Although policy states this is optional, I agree with you so I've done
it.
> Also, remove the commented out lines in debian/rules.
Done - I agree,
On Tue, 24, Aug, 2004 at 01:51:40PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar spoke thus..
> Include the upstream homepage in the description in debian/control.
Although policy states this is optional, I agree with you so I've done
it.
> Also, remove the commented out lines in debian/rules.
Done - I agree,
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 09:17:09AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
>The debian/copyright lists the upstream authors, but doesn't give any
>copyright declaration:
>
>Also, AUTHORS also includes "Rick Chern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>",
>which is not listed in debian/copyright.
>
>Also, there are quite a f
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 09:17:09AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
>The debian/copyright lists the upstream authors, but doesn't give any
>copyright declaration:
>
>Also, AUTHORS also includes "Rick Chern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>",
>which is not listed in debian/copyright.
>
>Also, there are quite a f
On Sunday 22 August 2004 09:45, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Sun, 22, Aug, 2004 at 09:17:09AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke
> thus..
>
> > A couple copyright things:
> >
> > The debian/copyright lists the upstream authors, but doesn't give
> > any copyright declaration:
>
> OK. I've added this to the
On Sun, 22, Aug, 2004 at 09:17:09AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke thus..
> A couple copyright things:
>
> The debian/copyright lists the upstream authors, but doesn't give any
> copyright declaration:
OK. I've added this to the file (based on a grep of the source): will it do?
Copyright (C)
On Saturday 21 August 2004 19:06, Mark Hymers wrote:
> * Package name: kst
> Version : 0.9.9
> Upstream Author : C. Barth Netterfield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL :
> http://omega.astro.utoronto.ca/kst/
> * License : GPL
> Description : A KDE application use
On Sunday 22 August 2004 09:45, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Sun, 22, Aug, 2004 at 09:17:09AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke
> thus..
>
> > A couple copyright things:
> >
> > The debian/copyright lists the upstream authors, but doesn't give
> > any copyright declaration:
>
> OK. I've added this to the
On Sun, 22, Aug, 2004 at 09:17:09AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke thus..
> A couple copyright things:
>
> The debian/copyright lists the upstream authors, but doesn't give any
> copyright declaration:
OK. I've added this to the file (based on a grep of the source): will it do?
Copyright (C)
On Saturday 21 August 2004 19:06, Mark Hymers wrote:
> * Package name: kst
> Version : 0.9.9
> Upstream Author : C. Barth Netterfield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL :
> http://omega.astro.utoronto.ca/kst/
> * License : GPL
> Description : A KDE application use
I would like to apologise to the list for causing that last message to
be sent here from the BTS. I assume it was due to an incorrect setting
of the Reply-To field on my part.
Mark
--
Mark Hymers, University of Newcastle Medical School
Intercalating Medical Student (MBBS / PhD)
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you wish
Hi,
(CC'd to bugs.debian.org as an update to the ITP)
Source Package (for potential sponsors)
===
This is my second request for a sponser for kst. I've updated my
packaged version to kst-0.99 and uploaded the source to
mentors.debian.net (http://mentors.debia
I would like to apologise to the list for causing that last message to
be sent here from the BTS. I assume it was due to an incorrect setting
of the Reply-To field on my part.
Mark
--
Mark Hymers, University of Newcastle Medical School
Intercalating Medical Student (MBBS / PhD)
--
To UNSUBSC
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you wish
Hi,
(CC'd to bugs.debian.org as an update to the ITP)
Source Package (for potential sponsors)
===
This is my second request for a sponser for kst. I've updated my
packaged version to kst-0.99 and uploaded the source to
mentors.debian.net (http://mentors.debia
28 matches
Mail list logo
