Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2016 18:13:07 +0100
with message-id <20161224171306.2j4mfxvlmel5p...@mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#841066: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions-pixelsaver/1.9-1,
ITP: 829089 -- pixel saver extension for GNOME shell
has caused the Debian Bug report #841066,
reg
Your message dated Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:55:11 +0200
with message-id <1477731311.5623.4.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#841917: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions-refresh-wifi/6-1,
ITP: 841913 -- keep wifi access point list current in GNOME shell
has caused the Debian Bug report #
Your message dated Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:08:08 +0200
with message-id <1477728488.5623.3.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#841065: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions-dashtodock/55-1,
ITP: 829185 -- dash-to-dock extension for GNOME shell
has caused the Debian Bug report #841065,
regardi
On 25/10/2016 08:53, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
> Will do, I also want to rename this package and ensure its upstream
> tarball is the same as in Kali Linux, since they have it packaged
> already and would like to avoid breakage (see
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841
On 24/10/2016 21:55, Tobias Frost wrote:
> can you add a gnome-shell dependency to the binary package?
>
> Otherwise it is fine and I'll upload it then.
Will do, I also want to rename this package and ensure its upstream
tarball is the same as in Kali Linux, since they have it packaged
already an
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Jonathan,
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 14:49 +0200 schrieb Jonathan Carter
(highvoltage):
>
> * Package name : gnome-shell-extensions-refresh-wifi
> Version : 6-1
> Upstream Author : Gopi Sankar Karmegam
> * URL : https://github.com/kgshank/gse-ref
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:50:19 +0200
with message-id <1477338619.30769.4.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#841924: RFS:
gnome-shell-extensions-hide-activities/0.00~git20131024.1.6574986-1, ITP:
841920 -- GNOME shell extension that hides the activities button
has caus
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:43:35 +0200
with message-id <1477338215.30769.3.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions-remove-dropdown-arrows/7-1,
ITP: 829071 -- removes drop down, arrows from panel on GNOME shell
has caused the Debian Bug report #
Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 11:31 +0200 schrieb Jonathan Carter
(highvoltage):
> On 22/10/2016 16:28, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > - translators copyright should be also recorded in d/copyright.
>
> I added the translations with copyright assertions in d/copyright:
>
> https://gitlab.com/highvoltage/gn
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"gnome-shell-extensions-hide-activities":
* Package name: gnome-shell-extensions-hide-activities
Version : 0.00~git20131024.1.6574986-1
Upstream Author : Shay Elkin
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"gnome-shell-extensions-refresh-wifi":
* Package name: gnome-shell-extensions-refresh-wifi
Version : 6-1
Upstream Author : Gopi Sankar Karmegam
* URL : https://git
Hey Tobi
I uploaded a new version that addresses that and the nitpicks you mentioned:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnome-shell-extension-remove-dropdown-arrows
-Jonathan
On 22/10/2016 16:28, Tobias Frost wrote:
> - translators copyright should be also recorded in d/copyright.
I added the translations with copyright assertions in d/copyright:
https://gitlab.com/highvoltage/gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock-packaging/commit/e446de895987a1a271c9e3fe7232ed853fc772ea
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi highvoltage,
Package does not build using pbuilder, I think a B-D on zip is missing
dh build
dh_testdir
dh_update_autotools_config
dh_auto_configure
dh_auto_build
make -j1
make[1]: Entering directory '/build/gnome-shell-extensi
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hallo highvoltage,
Can you check if you think those comments are valid?
- the patch for the installation directory should be upstreamed,
(I had something similar for one of my extensions, I solved it this
way:)
https://github.com/laserb/gnome-shell-
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi highvoltage,
Package is fine, however one thing needs fixing:
The themes have authorship attributed, but this is not reflected in
the copyright file. Those themes also do not necessarily have the same
license as the extension itself (e.g Arc-dark s
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"gnome-shell-extensions-remove-dropdown-arrows":
* Package name: gnome-shell-extensions-remove-dropdown-arrows
Version : 7-1
Upstream Author : Martin Pöhlmann
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"gnome-shell-extension-pixelsaver":
* Package name: gnome-shell-extension-pixelsaver
Version : 19-1
Upstream Author : Amaury Séchet
* URL : https://github.com/dea
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"gnome-shell-extensions-dashtodock":
* Package name: gnome-shell-extensions-dashtodock
Version : 55-1
Upstream Author : Michele
* URL : https://micheleg.github.
Am 06.11.2011 14:57, schrieb Victor Seva:
> 2011/11/6 Leo 'costela' Antunes :
>> On 06/11/11 12:34, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>> Since there is no extension manager in 3.0, I think we should start this
>>> package from gnome-shell 3.2 (currently sitting in experimental). This
>>> way there would be
2011/11/6 Leo 'costela' Antunes :
> On 06/11/11 12:34, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Since there is no extension manager in 3.0, I think we should start this
>> package from gnome-shell 3.2 (currently sitting in experimental). This
>> way there would be no need for this hair-splitting
>> one-extension
2011/11/6 Michael Biebl :
> Am 06.11.2011 12:34, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
>> Sorry for not replying earlier. I agree this package is important to
>> have in pkg-gnome.
>
> Agreed. Imo this package should be maintained within the pkg-gnome team,
> using the pkg-gnome infrastructure (like VCS, cdbs
On 06/11/11 12:34, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Since there is no extension manager in 3.0, I think we should start this
> package from gnome-shell 3.2 (currently sitting in experimental). This
> way there would be no need for this hair-splitting
> one-extension-per-package which only makes things mor
Am 06.11.2011 12:34, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Hi,
>
> Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 10:24 +0100, Victor Seva a écrit :
>> Dear mentors and Gnome maintainers,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for gnome-shell-extensions. The source is
>> accessible at [0] and the binaries on [1]. As you can see on
Hi,
Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 10:24 +0100, Victor Seva a écrit :
> Dear mentors and Gnome maintainers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for gnome-shell-extensions. The source is
> accessible at [0] and the binaries on [1]. As you can see on [2] I
> already have been helping maintaining other pac
2011/11/5 Leo 'costela' Antunes :
> [taking the liberty of adding reply-to:mentors, to avoid further
> cross-posting, but inform gnome-devels of intention to review/sponsor]
>
> Hi,
Hi, thanks for take time reviewing the package.
> The package seems good, but I have a couple of structural comment
[taking the liberty of adding reply-to:mentors, to avoid further
cross-posting, but inform gnome-devels of intention to review/sponsor]
Hi,
On 01/11/11 10:24, Victor Seva wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for gnome-shell-extensions. The source is
> accessible at [0] and the binaries on [1]. As
Dear mentors and Gnome maintainers,
I am looking for a sponsor for gnome-shell-extensions. The source is
accessible at [0] and the binaries on [1]. As you can see on [2] I
already have been helping maintaining other packages.
The idea is to integrate the package in the gnome vcs if you think it
de
28 matches
Mail list logo
