Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-11-01 Thread chrysn
hello enrique, i've just built fritzing from your package (fritzing_0.4.3b-4), but ran into problems as described in [#571640] ("qmake build system can't be set to use qmake-qt3 or qmake-qt4"). this typically happens on systems that have qt3-dev-tools installed; in that case, debhelper uses /usr/

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-31 Thread Scott Howard
Thanks for packaging fritzing, btw - it's a good tool to have in Debian. 2010/10/31 Enrique Hernández Bello : > 2010/10/26 Scott Howard >> 2010/10/24 Enrique Hernández Bello : >> 1) instead of CDBS and explicitly using quilt, would you consider >> using source format 3.0 (quilt) and debhelper 7 [

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-31 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
2010/10/31 Fernando Lemos > Hi, > > 2010/10/31 Enrique Hernández Bello : > >> This is your first release, and version 0.4.3b-1 makes sense to me as > >> the first debian packaging released. > >> > > > > If I don't increment the release number, I can't upload it to mentors > > repository. What do

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-31 Thread Fernando Lemos
Hi, 2010/10/31 Enrique Hernández Bello : >> This is your first release, and version 0.4.3b-1 makes sense to me as >> the first debian packaging released. >> > > If I don't increment the release number, I can't upload it to mentors > repository. What do you suggest? What is the common way to versio

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-31 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
2010/10/26 Scott Howard > 2010/10/24 Enrique Hernández Bello : > > What is the next step? :) > > -- > > Enrique Hernández Bello > > > > Hi Enrique, > > I'm not a DD yet, but I learned a lot from sponsors being extremely > picky about my packages. Here are some comments for you to consider: > > 1)

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-29 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:23:13PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > I like it too, therefore I had a very quick look at the package. I > believe your package must build without internet connection. So I think > you should change your rules logic and probably just include a > upstream-changelog manually

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-28 Thread Paul Gevers
> 6) I like the control.in and debian/rules magic to have different > dependencies between debian and ubuntu. I haven't seen that before, > and it prevents a diff between the two. I like it too, therefore I had a very quick look at the package. I believe your package must build without internet co

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-26 Thread Scott Howard
2010/10/24 Enrique Hernández Bello : > What is the next step? :) > -- > Enrique Hernández Bello > Hi Enrique, I'm not a DD yet, but I learned a lot from sponsors being extremely picky about my packages. Here are some comments for you to consider: 1) instead of CDBS and explicitly using quilt, wo

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-24 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:14:04PM +0100, Enrique Hernández Bello wrote: > Hi, I solved the remain problems. The ITP bug number is #601230. You can > check the bugreport here: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601230 > > What is the next step? :) ---end quoted text--- Close th

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-24 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
2010/10/24 Paul Gevers > [Please don't top post. Debian e-mail list prefer in-line and bottom > posts.] > > I haven't looked at the package bug I try to help by commenting on your > question > > > 1) What is an ITP bug? why I must to open it to close after? > > An ITP bug is an Intent To Package

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-24 Thread Paul Gevers
[Please don't top post. Debian e-mail list prefer in-line and bottom posts.] I haven't looked at the package bug I try to help by commenting on your question > 1) What is an ITP bug? why I must to open it to close after? An ITP bug is an Intent To Package bug against WNPP pseudo package in the D

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-23 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 09:15:12PM +0100, Enrique Hernández Bello wrote: > I've recently uploaded my last version of Fritzing package. I've fixed all > lintian errors and warnings and I've followed all recommendations except > packaging this application under pkg-electronics team. I've suscribed to

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-23 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
Hello! thanks for your reply. Answering you: 1) What is an ITP bug? why I must to open it to close after? 2) I don't know really, but I guess that empty directories are usefull to extend the electronic parts of the application by the user or other packages. Because that I decide keep them. El 23

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-23 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
Hello debian mentors! ;) I've recently uploaded my last version of Fritzing package. I've fixed all lintian errors and warnings and I've followed all recommendations except packaging this application under pkg-electronics team. I've suscribed to their list but I don't know what I must to do about.

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-04 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:42:48PM +0100, Enrique Hernández Bello wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fritzing". > > * Package name: fritzing > Version : 0.4.3b-1 > Upstream Author : Fritzing Developers > * URL : http://fritzing.org >

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-04 Thread أحمد المحمودي
Hello, On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:42:48PM +0100, Enrique Hernández Bello wrote: > It builds these binary packages: > fritzing - Easy-to-use, electronic design software ---end quoted text--- * Please consider packaging it under pkg-electronics team [1]. * There are some lintian issues: W: frit

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-10-03 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
You should avoid getting it into the Ubuntu repositories directly -- there is a sync every cycle, if it's uploaded to Debian, it will be in Ubuntu in time for the next release, try focusing on getting this RFS through the Debian system -- no need to use REVU for this. 2010/10/3 Enrique Hernández B

RFS: fritzing

2010-10-03 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fritzing". * Package name: fritzing Version : 0.4.3b-1 Upstream Author : Fritzing Developers * URL : http://fritzing.org * License : GPLv3 & CC:BY-SA Section : electronics It builds these bina

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-06-29 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
2010/6/29 أحمد المحمودي > Hello, > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 02:27:16AM +0100, Enrique Hernández Bello wrote: > > * Package name: fritzing > > Version : 0.3.19b > > Upstream Author : Fritzing Developers > > * URL : http://fritzing.org > > * License : GPLv3 & CC

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-06-29 Thread أحمد المحمودي
Hello, On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 02:27:16AM +0100, Enrique Hernández Bello wrote: > * Package name: fritzing > Version : 0.3.19b > Upstream Author : Fritzing Developers > * URL : http://fritzing.org > * License : GPLv3 & CC-BY-SA > Section : electronics

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-06-26 Thread Raphael Geissert
Paul Wise wrote: > Please don't use HTML email on Debian lists: > A text/plain version of the message was included, so it's not a case I would jump on. It's just a matter of disabling HTML emails (on both ends: writer and reader.) Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-06-26 Thread Paul Wise
Please don't use HTML email on Debian lists: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

RFS: fritzing

2010-06-26 Thread Enrique Hernández Bello
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fritzing". * Package name: fritzing Version : 0.3.19b Upstream Author : Fritzing Developers * URL : http://fritzing.org * License : GPLv3 & CC-BY-SA Section : electronics It builds these binary