Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-19 Thread Joey Parrish
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 04:49, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > I see what you mean, but my intent was to get flex-sdk into non-free or > > contrib first. When that's finalized, we can undertake the (rather > large) > > task of getting the SDK built from source, after which point it can be > moved

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-17 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
> I see what you mean, but my intent was to get flex-sdk into non-free or > contrib first.  When that's finalized, we can undertake the (rather large) > task of getting the SDK built from source, after which point it can be moved > into main.  In my opinion, there's no point in splitting it up righ

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-09 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: I need flex-sdk for jPlayer ( http://jplayer.org/ ), which is needed by witty 3.1.11+ could you test the package by building it from the repository and let us know if there are problems? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-09 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: I see what you mean, but my intent was to get flex-sdk into non-free or contrib first.  When that's finalized, we can undertake the (rather large) task of getting the SDK built from source, after which point it can be moved into main.  In my opinion, there

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-09 Thread Joey Parrish
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 23:14, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > Well, the only data point I have is yui which works fine with 4.5. I > don't know of any other packages in Debian which need flex-sdk yet. So I > would wait to cross that bridge when we get to it. > > Also when it does become necessary, the

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-09 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: > > Well, the only data point I have is yui which works fine with 4.5.  I don't > know of any other packages in Debian which need flex-sdk yet.  So I would > wait to cross that bridge when we get to it

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-08 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: No, but my last company used Flex quite a lot, and every new version seemed to introduce incompatibilities.  Software written for 4.1 won't necessarily work without modification on 4.5.  So I thought it would make sense to be prepared to provide multiple v

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-08 Thread Joey Parrish
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 08:02, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: > >> Jaldhar, >> >> I haven't heard back in a while. Anything wrong with my package or repo >> that's holding up an upload? >> > > Sorry, real life got in the way. A couple of things I noticed. > > 1.

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-08 Thread Joey Parrish
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 07:19, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 16:02:55, Joey Parrish a écrit : > > Hi Joey, > > > I haven't heard back in a while. Anything wrong with my package or repo > > that's holding up an upload? > > Your repository doesn't show up on [1], did you

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-07 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: Jaldhar, I haven't heard back in a while.  Anything wrong with my package or repo that's holding up an upload? Sorry, real life got in the way. A couple of things I noticed. 1. I think I mentioned this before; we should concentrate on 4.5. I don't

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-06 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 16:02:55, Joey Parrish a écrit : > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:52, Joey Parrish wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 18:22, Joey Parrish wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 17:23, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > >>> I talked to the Alioth admins about it and it should be approved

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-11-06 Thread Joey Parrish
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:52, Joey Parrish wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 18:22, Joey Parrish wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 17:23, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: >> >>> I talked to the Alioth admins about it and it should be approved now. >>> >> >> Excellent. I'll get to work setting up the repo

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-25 Thread Joey Parrish
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 18:22, Joey Parrish wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 17:23, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > >> I talked to the Alioth admins about it and it should be approved now. >> > > Excellent. I'll get to work setting up the repo tomorrow. > I have the repository set up on alioth now. It

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-24 Thread Joey Parrish
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 17:23, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > I talked to the Alioth admins about it and it should be approved now. > Excellent. I'll get to work setting up the repo tomorrow. Thanks, --Joey

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-24 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 13:32, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: Have you created the repo yet?  I'm waiting on it to do the upload. Sorry it took so long to reply, I've been out of town for a few days. I have submitted a request to alioth for hostin

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-22 Thread Joey Parrish
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 19:06, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:01:11 +0200, Joey Parrish > wrote: > > Note that the Flex SDK itself cannot yet be built from Adobe's source > > code under Debian, even though the code is released under the MPL. > > Adobe's build system relies on

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-22 Thread Joey Parrish
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 13:32, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > Have you created the repo yet? I'm waiting on it to do the upload. Sorry it took so long to reply, I've been out of town for a few days. I have submitted a request to alioth for hosting, but I have not received any reply yet. I have an

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-17 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi Joey, On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:01:11 +0200, Joey Parrish wrote: > Note that the Flex SDK itself cannot yet be built from Adobe's source > code under Debian, even though the code is released under the MPL. > Adobe's build system relies on Cygwin and some outdated and/or patched > libraries to pro

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-17 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: Does the Debian community standardize on git, or is an svn repo also acceptable? I don't have any experience with git yet, but I'm a frequent user of svn. Git is definitely more popular (and my preference)

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-13 Thread David Given
On 13/10/11 16:13, Joey Parrish wrote: [...] > Does the Debian community standardize on git, or is an svn repo also > acceptable? I don't have any experience with git yet, but I'm a > frequent user of svn. If you like SVN you may be interested in checking out Mercurial; it speaks git, so you can

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-13 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: Does the Debian community standardize on git, or is an svn repo also acceptable? I don't have any experience with git yet, but I'm a frequent user of svn. Git is definitely more popular (and my preference) but there's nothing wrong with svn. -- Jal

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-13 Thread Joey Parrish
On 2011-10-13, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > However this seems like something that's eminently fixable. Your first > order of business should be to set up a public git repository on alioth so > that you can get the wider Debian community to help. Does the Debian community standardize on git, or is a

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-13 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: Dear mentors (and those BCC'd whom I've been speaking to about "flex-sdk"), I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flex-sdk-4.5". I'm on it. Expect an upload later today. This is the latest released version of Flex from Adobe, but if either of

RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-13 Thread Joey Parrish
Dear mentors (and those BCC'd whom I've been speaking to about "flex-sdk"), I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flex-sdk-4.5". Bugs #591969 (package "typo3-src") and #632478 (package "nicofox") are both waiting on this package so that these packages can build their swf files from source.