Your message dated Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:24:54 + (UTC)
with message-id <145823428.1256271.1473081894...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#836749: RFS: autoconf-archive/20160320-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #836749,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20160320-1
to be marked a
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive"
* Package name: autoconf-archive
Version : 20160320-1
Section : devel
It builds those binary packages:
autoconf-archive - Autoconf Macro
Your message dated Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:29:11 +
with message-id <20160104132911.ge18...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#809772: RFS: autoconf-archive/20150925-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #809772,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20150925-1
to be marked as done.
This mean
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive"
* Package name: autoconf-archive
Version : 20150925-1
Section : devel
It builds those binary packages:
autoconf-archive - Autoconf Macr
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:27:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20150224-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #790300,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20150224-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive"
* Package name: autoconf-archive
Version : 20150224-1
Section : devel
It builds those bin
Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:29:06 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20140228-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #745362,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20140228-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: Mathieu Malaterre
X-Debbugs-CC: glaub...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive"
* Package name: autoconf-archive
Version : 20140228-1
It builds those binary package
Hi Bastien!
On 04/20/2014 11:43 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Closes:
> #737087 (important): autoconf-archive: ax_boost_date_time broken by multiarch
> #741574 (normal): autoconf-archive: new upstream version
You don't have to file an RFS bug report in order to ask me to sponsor
an upload. Just
Your message dated Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:23:59 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20130609-2 [
has caused the Debian Bug report #723652,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20130609-2 [
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive"
Package name: autoconf-archive
Version : 20130609-2
It builds those binary packages:
autoconf-archive - Autoconf Macro Archive
autoconf-gl-macros - Autoconf Ope
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:23:17 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20130609-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #712910,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20130609-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Please check the replacement of autoconf-gl-macros package
> Pabs could you check if your pacakge built with this version ?
chromium-bsu builds just fine with the new macros from
autoconf-archive on Debian. I haven't tested this on other
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> CC: Paul Wise
Firstly, please use X-Debbugs-CC instead of CC when reporting bugs:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc
> Please check the replacement of autoconf-gl-macros package
>
> Pabs could you check if your pacakge built wit
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive"
* Package name: autoconf-archive
Version : 20130609-1
Section : devel
It builds those binary packages:
autoconf-archive - Autoconf Macro Ar
Your message dated Tue, 19 Mar 2013 07:14:22 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20130202-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #703070,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20130202-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive"
* Package name: autoconf-archive
Version : 20130202-1
* License : see debian/copyright mainly permissive license
Section : devel
It b
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:02:39 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20111221-2 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #700814,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20111221-2 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive"
I am fixing a RC bug:
* Bug fix: "unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE", thanks to Andreas Beckmann (Closes: #700789).
Thanks
Bastien
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:02:36PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:05:31PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20110717-1
> > of my package "autoconf-archive".
> >
> > It builds these binary packages:
> >
Hi Bastien,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:05:31PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20110717-1
> of my package "autoconf-archive".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> autoconf-archive - Autoconf Macro Archive
>
> The package appears to be lintian cl
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20110717-1
of my package "autoconf-archive".
It builds these binary packages:
autoconf-archive - Autoconf Macro Archive
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.deb
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:47:25 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> I've not "fixed" the unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt warning of lintian, but
> maybe that could be part of the gitpkg "fix" that would only ship
> debian/patches (including debian/patches/series) if it's really
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 12:34 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> I have done the work needed
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
>> > Hi Bastien,
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:17 +0200, roucaries bas
Hi Bastien,
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 12:34 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
> I have done the work needed
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Hi Bastien,
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:17 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
> >> Ping ?
> >
> > 1. debian/watch needs fixing to av
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:06:06 +0200, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> Not fixed in my case:
> lintian *.changes || lintian --version
> E: autoconf-archive source: git-patches-not-exported
> Lintian v2.5.1
Ah, yes. I agree this is a bug, different than the bug we just fixed in
gitpkg. I'm not sure at th
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 7:54 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:41:05 +0200, roucaries bastien
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:30 PM, David Bremner wrote:
>>
>> I use 0.20, it does not export patches but lintian complain. See the
>> file in mentors. I believe it is a lintia
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:41:05 +0200, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:30 PM, David Bremner wrote:
>
> I use 0.20, it does not export patches but lintian complain. See the
> file in mentors. I believe it is a lintian bug.
> What do you think ?
>
Certainly
E: autoconf-ar
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:30 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:30 +0200, roucaries bastien
> wrote:
>>
>> They are no patches. It is a bug in gitpkg even after david Bremner
>> patch lintian complain.
>>
>
> I'm a bit surprised by that. In any case, try version 0.20 of gitpkg
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:34:30 +0200, roucaries bastien
wrote:
>
> They are no patches. It is a bug in gitpkg even after david Bremner
> patch lintian complain.
>
I'm a bit surprised by that. In any case, try version 0.20 of gitpkg
which contains a different fix. If there is still a bug, please
I have done the work needed
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:17 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> Ping ?
>
> 1. debian/watch needs fixing to avoid your ugly epoch hack:
> opts="uversionmangle=s/[-\.]//g" \
> is the correct way to up
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:17:46 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
>
> 3. Lintian still warns about:
> E: autoconf-archive source: git-patches-not-exported
> P: autoconf-archive source: unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt
>
Hi Bastien, Hi Kilian;
As
lintian-info -t git-patches-not-exported
indicates, tha
Hi Bastien,
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:17 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
> Ping ?
1. debian/watch needs fixing to avoid your ugly epoch hack:
opts="uversionmangle=s/[-\.]//g" \
is the correct way to update
2. DEP5 is now at
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?view=markup&pathr
Ping ?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:03 AM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> Reuploaded a new version comments online
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Kilian Krause wrote:
>> Hi Bastien,
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 07:50 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>> Please do not upload directly, i will upload git
Reuploaded a new version comments online
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 07:50 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> Please do not upload directly, i will upload git tree before under
>> collab maint and postthe final ppackage here.
>>
>> I
Hi Bastien,
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 07:50 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
> Please do not upload directly, i will upload git tree before under
> collab maint and postthe final ppackage here.
>
> It is more a rfc.
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive_201
Please do not upload directly, i will upload git tree before under collab
maint and postthe final ppackage here.
It is more a rfc.
Bastien
Le 6 juil. 2011 15:14, "Bastien ROUCARIES" a
écrit :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:2011.04.12-1
of the package "autoconf-
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:2011.04.12-1
of the package "autoconf-archive".
It builds these binary packages:
autoconf-archive - Autoconf Macro Archive
The upload would fix these bugs: 214089, 568413, 572669, 584180, 593838, 622369
The package can be found on m
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:37, Deng Xiyue
wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20090426-1
> of my package "autoconf-archive".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> T
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20090426-1
of my package "autoconf-archive".
It builds these binary packages:
autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Deng Xiyue
wrote:
> I'm now CCing debian...@lists.debian.org to query the MIA
> status of Qingning Huo , and asking for suggestions
> for the current situation: whether to continue this NMU or to
> co-maintain the package. Thanks in advance.
Last activity was 1s
Michael Tautschnig writes:
>> Michael Tautschnig writes:
>>
>> > [...]
>> >>
>> >> Please note, although this is a NMU (The original maintainer marked the
>> >> package LowNMU), I've done somewhat radical changes in the packaging so
>> >> as to fix some of the bugs in BTS, such as #451640, #48
> Michael Tautschnig writes:
>
> > [...]
> >>
> >> Please note, although this is a NMU (The original maintainer marked the
> >> package LowNMU), I've done somewhat radical changes in the packaging so
> >> as to fix some of the bugs in BTS, such as #451640, #485905.
> >>
> >> I would be glad if
Michael Tautschnig writes:
> [...]
>>
>> Please note, although this is a NMU (The original maintainer marked the
>> package LowNMU), I've done somewhat radical changes in the packaging so
>> as to fix some of the bugs in BTS, such as #451640, #485905.
>>
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded t
[...]
>
> Please note, although this is a NMU (The original maintainer marked the
> package LowNMU), I've done somewhat radical changes in the packaging so
> as to fix some of the bugs in BTS, such as #451640, #485905.
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
Did you conta
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf-archive".
* Package name: autoconf-archive
Version : 20081107-0.1
Upstream Author : Peter Simons and many others
* URL : http://autoconf-archive.cryp.to/
* License : GPL 3
Section : de
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the autoconf-archive package I adopted
(ITA #279554[0]). All the package files can be found at
debian.mayhq.org[1].
Package: autoconf-archive
License: GPL (with exceptions)
Architecture: all
Description: The Autoconf Macro Archive
The Autoconf Macro Archive ai
Hello mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the adopted package: autoconf-archive
[#279554], (http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/autoconf-archive.html).
This is an arch-all pacakge. The package description is:
The GNU Autoconf Macro Archive aims to provide a central repository of
useful and t
48 matches
Mail list logo
