Your message dated Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:36:41 +0100
with message-id <50d59b49.80...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#692874: liferea: diff for NMU version 1.8.6-1+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692975,
regarding RFS: liferea/1.8.6-1.1 [NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means th
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liferea"
* Package name: liferea
Version : 1.8.6-1.1
Upstream Author : Lars Windolf
* URL : http://liferea.sourceforge.net
* License : GPLv2
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:44:58PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > New, working, package at the same URL. I ended up removing the patch
> > from the last update, as the poster wrote later saying it didn't solve
> > the problems after all.
>
> Took us a while, but it's now sorted and I've just upl
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 09:44:45PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:43:52PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
> > [...]
> > > The follo
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:43:52PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
> [...]
> > The following packages have been kept back:
> > liferea
>
> I've got a question on your transi
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> [Note: I updated the package to backport a patch from 1.2.5, which
> both a reporter and upstream agree should close #379900. Please, if you
> deem the package uploadable, do grab the new version first, from the
> same UR
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:08:36PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > I suspect you need the third horseman of the package apocalypse,
> > > Replaces:,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > > What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking
> > out a
> > Provides: liferea-gtkhtml
> > to the liferea package, with no res
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> I do have an issue I need help testing before upload. If I install
> etch/sid liferea + liferea-gtkhtml in a chroot, then add a sources
> line for my private repository with this new version, apt-get update,
> apt-get dis
My regular sponsor for this package has been busy lately. Could
someone review and do a one time sponsoring of this?
http://www.nul-unu.com/quien/rodrigo/debian/liferea/liferea_1.0.27-2.dsc
I do have an issue I need help testing before upload. If I install
etch/sid liferea + liferea-gtkhtml in a
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 21:02 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> note that it has not been orphaned, but given up for adoption instead
> (what is called "Request For Adoption").
>
> you should express your intention to adopt it to the maintainer (and
> send a copy to the bug report, #272165 in
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 02:46:08PM -0400, Lee Aylward wrote:
> I noticed that Liferea had recently been orphaned, and that there is a
> new upstream version. I packaged the new version (0.6.0), which can be
> found on my repository at http://laylward.com/debian/
>
> deb http://laylward.com/debian/
* Lee Aylward [Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:46:08 -0400]:
(in http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00139.html)
> I noticed that Liferea had recently been orphaned, and that there is a
> new upstream version.
note that it has not been orphaned, but given up for adoption instead
(what is
I noticed that Liferea had recently been orphaned, and that there is a
new upstream version. I packaged the new version (0.6.0), which can be
found on my repository at http://laylward.com/debian/
deb http://laylward.com/debian/ unstable/
deb-src http://laylward.com/debian/ unstable/
This is my fi
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 21:02 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> note that it has not been orphaned, but given up for adoption instead
> (what is called "Request For Adoption").
>
> you should express your intention to adopt it to the maintainer (and
> send a copy to the bug report, #272165 in
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 02:46:08PM -0400, Lee Aylward wrote:
> I noticed that Liferea had recently been orphaned, and that there is a
> new upstream version. I packaged the new version (0.6.0), which can be
> found on my repository at http://laylward.com/debian/
>
> deb http://laylward.com/debian/
* Lee Aylward [Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:46:08 -0400]:
(in http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00139.html)
> I noticed that Liferea had recently been orphaned, and that there is a
> new upstream version.
note that it has not been orphaned, but given up for adoption instead
(what is
I noticed that Liferea had recently been orphaned, and that there is a
new upstream version. I packaged the new version (0.6.0), which can be
found on my repository at http://laylward.com/debian/
deb http://laylward.com/debian/ unstable/
deb-src http://laylward.com/debian/ unstable/
This is my fi
19 matches
Mail list logo
