Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you please invest in some empty lines between your text and the text
you quote? This is hardly readable. Thanks.
>> >> > especially if a package maintainer is the upstream.
>> >> This isn't an argument for inclusion of the debian directory (will
> >> > especially if a package maintainer is the upstream.
> >> This isn't an argument for inclusion of the debian directory (will you
> >> release a new upstream version just because you need to change a
> >> build-depends and trigger a rebuild on the Debian buildds?).
> > yikes... pardon my ignor
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > especially if a package maintainer is the upstream.
>> This isn't an argument for inclusion of the debian directory (will you
>> release a new upstream version just because you need to change a
>> build-depends and trigger a rebuild on the Debian
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> if buildd is triggered by deb revision increment as well -- there is no
> difference between boosting of the upstream version or only deb
> revision...
There are a few benefits of only a debian revision boost. First, you only
upload a small diff instead of the full packa
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:07:04AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>>Christoph Haas wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>>cool, So I'll need to register my signature as a Debian Developer.
>>I'll figure out how to do this thanks.
>
> > especially if a package maintainer is the upstream.
> This isn't an argument for inclusion of the debian directory (will you
> release a new upstream version just because you need to change a
> build-depends and trigger a rebuild on the Debian buildds?).
yikes... pardon my ignorance if it is no
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I don't see anything which requires debian/ directory to be absent
> from the orig.tar.gz
You are right, there is no such "law". But still it's a bad idea.
> especially if a package maintainer is the upstream.
This isn't an argument for inclus
> > > You need to remove debian/ directory form fslint_2.15.orig.tar.gz file in
> > > order to produce non Debian native package!
> > Could you please point me where it is *required* (to address "need
> > to") that upstream sourced do not include debian/?
> > I fully understand, that
> from http:/
> > developer's signature on the package to be accepted in the official
> > repositories - just a security measure.
> cool, So I'll need to register my signature as a Debian Developer.
> I'll figure out how to do this thanks.
(Un)fortunately becoming a debian developer is a long term step, for now
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:07:04AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> cool, So I'll need to register my signature as a Debian Developer.
> I'll figure out how to do this thanks.
Uhm, you would need to become a De
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>>Justin Pryzby wrote:
>>
>On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:06:33PM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
As far as I can see you want me to provide:
fslint_2.15-1.dsc
fslint_2.15-1.orig.tar.gz
f
Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > You need to remove debian/ directory form fslint_2.15.orig.tar.gz file in
> > order to produce non Debian native package!
>
> Could you please point me where it is *required* (to address "need
> to") that upstream sourced do not include debian/?
> I full
Sorry to intrude but I wanted to clarify a bit (although there had been
a lengthy thread on native packages not that long ago)
> You need to remove debian/ directory form fslint_2.15.orig.tar.gz file in
> order to produce non Debian native package!
Could you please point me where it is *required*
You need to remove debian/ directory form fslint_2.15.orig.tar.gz file in
order to produce non Debian native package!
--
-=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=-
-=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-
pgphPDgEBRFRd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >>>On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:06:33PM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
> >>As far as I can see you want me to provide:
> >>
> >>fslint_2.15-1.dsc
> >>fslint_2.15-1.orig.tar.gz
> >>fslint_2.15-1.diff.gz
> >
> > Yea,
Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done. The following "source package" was built with:
> dpkg-source -b fslint-2.15 fslint_2.15.orig.tar.gz
[...]
> I'm confused as to why it didn't ask me to sign it.
I don't know if that's expected (I usually use 'debuild' to build my
source packages),
Justin Pryzby wrote:
>>>On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:06:33PM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
>>As far as I can see you want me to provide:
>>
>>fslint_2.15-1.dsc
>>fslint_2.15-1.orig.tar.gz
>>fslint_2.15-1.diff.gz
>
> Yea, this is the "source package". You could have an empty .diff.gz
Done. The follow
Hi there.
On May 22 2006, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > I see now. You are the actual developer of fslint. Usually there is
> > the (upstream) developer and a Debian developer is doing the
> > packaging work. If the upstream provides a debian/ package that has
> > caused a lot
Rogério Brito wrote:
> Hi, Pádraig.
>
> On May 22 2006, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>>Description: A toolkit to find redundant disk usage
>> FSlint is a toolkit to find redundant disk usage, like duplicate files
>> for example. It includes a GUI as well as a command line interface.
>
>
> This is a c
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:41:04PM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Hi, P?draig...
> >
> > you accidentally replies personally to me instead of sending a followup
> > to the mailing list.
>
> sorry.
>
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:06:33PM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
> >
Hi, Pádraig.
On May 22 2006, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Description: A toolkit to find redundant disk usage
> FSlint is a toolkit to find redundant disk usage, like duplicate files
> for example. It includes a GUI as well as a command line interface.
This is a class of tools that interest me quite
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Hi, Pádraig...
>
> you accidentally replies personally to me instead of sending a followup
> to the mailing list.
sorry.
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:06:33PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>>build from the extracted tarball directly with:
>>
>>dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:48:59AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I sent an RFS for FSlint 3 months ago.
> Since then, I have released 2.15 with fixes for lots
> of debian packaging comments from Justin Pryzby.
>
> So is it ready for inclusion?
>
> homepage: http://www.pixelbeat.org/fslint/
> sour
I sent an RFS for FSlint 3 months ago.
Since then, I have released 2.15 with fixes for lots
of debian packaging comments from Justin Pryzby.
BTW it seems very popular amoung debian users,
as much more debian packages than RPMs are downloaded from my site.
So is it ready for inclusion?
thanks,
Pá
Justin Pryzby wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 04:47:31PM -0500, pryzbyj wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:04:30PM +, P??draig Brady wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I've been maintaining FSlint for a few years now
>>>and it has proved quite popular. There have even
>>>been (buggy) thirdparty debian
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 04:47:31PM -0500, pryzbyj wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:04:30PM +, P??draig Brady wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been maintaining FSlint for a few years now
> > and it has proved quite popular. There have even
> > been (buggy) thirdparty debian packages floating arou
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:34:45PM +, P?draig Brady wrote:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:04:30PM +, P??draig Brady wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I've been maintaining FSlint for a few years now
> >>and it has proved quite popular. There have even
> >>been (buggy) thirdp
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:04:30PM +, P??draig Brady wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been maintaining FSlint for a few years now
> and it has proved quite popular. There have even
> been (buggy) thirdparty debian packages floating around.
> In the latest version (2.14) I have created a debian package,
>
Hi,
I've been maintaining FSlint for a few years now
and it has proved quite popular. There have even
been (buggy) thirdparty debian packages floating around.
In the latest version (2.14) I have created a debian package,
and it would be create if someone could sponsor this
package for inclusion in
29 matches
Mail list logo
