On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:34:45PM +0000, P?draig Brady wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:04:30PM +0000, P??draig Brady wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>I've been maintaining FSlint for a few years now > >>and it has proved quite popular. There have even > >>been (buggy) thirdparty debian packages floating around. > >>In the latest version (2.14) I have created a debian package, > >>and it would be create if someone could sponsor this > >>package for inclusion in debian. Oops; policy 3.5 recommends to not depend without versions on essential packages such as bash:
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s3.5 |Packages are not required to declare any dependencies they have on |other packages which are marked Essential (see below), and should not |do so unless they depend on a particular version of that package. Do you have an ITP filed? You should, and close it in the changelog. -$(MAKE) -C po clean This is evil; see bug #325372. You run perl substitution in the install target; why not create an install target which allows this generality? Uncomment watchfile lines. dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot is preferable to fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage (doc/FAQ) Please include a more detailed license statement, in the source files, in the README, and perhaps in "COPYING" or "LICENSE". All the bash scripts should probably be using set -e. Why not use some incarnation of tmpfile rather than TMP/unused_and_referenced_libs ? counter=counter+1 #use bash arithmetic for speed What?! All for now Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
