Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.4-2
of my package "ampache".
It builds these binary packages:
ampache- web-based audio file management system
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 549009
The package can be found on mentor
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 14:09 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.4-1
> > of my package "ampache".
>
> uploaded, thanks.
>
> --
> Andreas Henriksson
>
>
thank you :)
Charlie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.or
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.4-1
> of my package "ampache".
uploaded, thanks.
--
Andreas Henriksson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.4-1
of my package "ampache".
It builds these binary packages:
ampache- web-based audio file management system
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debia
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.2-1
of my package "ampache".
It builds these binary packages:
ampache- web-based audio file management system
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 552701, 553313, 554089
The package can be
Raphael Geissert writes:
> Well, experimental checks are not to be considered "irrelevant chatter",
> hence my question.
> The current experimental checks are:
> Tag: spelling-error-in-binary
> Severity: normal
> Certainty: wild-guess
> It is based on the output of strings(1) so it can't tell f
On Wed, Oct 21 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi Manoj,
>
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Manoj,
>>>
>>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> [...]
I find that experimental and pedantic add far too much
irrelevant chatter, and
Hi Manoj,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
>> Hi Manoj,
>>
>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> I find that experimental and pedantic add far too much
>>> irrelevant chatter, and that it tends to mask the problems one should
>>> actually
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:08:43PM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:14:54AM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, B
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:14:54AM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ben Finney
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please join me in public embarrassme
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:14:54AM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ben Finney
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please join me in public embarrassment of those who write changelog
> > > entries saying “make Lintian ha
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ben Finney
> wrote:
>
> > Please join me in public embarrassment of those who write changelog
> > entries saying “make Lintian happy”, etc.
> >
> > Lintian is not a deity to be appeased; it's a tool reporting
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Please join me in public embarrassment of those who write changelog
> entries saying “make Lintian happy”, etc.
>
> Lintian is not a deity to be appeased; it's a tool reporting that the
> package might need fixing for explicit *reasons*, formul
Jan Hauke Rahm writes:
> Hi Manoj,
>
> I'm not going to argue with you about this.
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 04:12:21AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > There is a time and a place where these lintian options are
> > useful. They certainly have a place, and are recommended for
> > e
Hi Manoj,
I'm not going to argue with you about this.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 04:12:21AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> There is a time and a place where these lintian options are
> useful. They certainly have a place, and are recommended for
> experienced developers, and critical for
On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi Manoj,
>
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> I find that experimental and pedantic add far too much
>> irrelevant chatter, and that it tends to mask the problems one should
>> actually fix.
>>
>
> Could you please elaborate a bit mo
On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:28:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20 2009, George Danchev wrote:
>>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
>> >> >> In future check your
Hi Manoj,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[...]
>
> I find that experimental and pedantic add far too much
> irrelevant chatter, and that it tends to mask the problems one should
> actually fix.
>
Could you please elaborate a bit more? I'd like to know how I can improve
lintian so that it is
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:28:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20 2009, George Danchev wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> >> >> In future check your packages with 'lintian -IE --pedantic *.changes' t
On Tue, Oct 20 2009, George Danchev wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
>> >> In future check your packages with 'lintian -IE --pedantic *.changes' to
>> >> catch minor issues. But the package looks good! :)
>> >
>> > Persona
> On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> >> In future check your packages with 'lintian -IE --pedantic *.changes' to
> >> catch minor issues. But the package looks good! :)
> >
> > Personally, I use this as it catches more things and give
On Tue, Oct 20 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
>
>> In future check your packages with 'lintian -IE --pedantic *.changes' to
>> catch minor issues. But the package looks good! :)
>
> Personally, I use this as it catches more things and gives more de
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 09:56 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:35:55AM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.1-2
> > of my package "ampache".
> >
> > As explained in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 04:07:27PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
>
> > In future check your packages with 'lintian -IE --pedantic *.changes' to
> > catch minor issues. But the package looks good! :)
>
> Personally, I use this as it catches more
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> In future check your packages with 'lintian -IE --pedantic *.changes' to
> catch minor issues. But the package looks good! :)
Personally, I use this as it catches more things and gives more detail:
lintian --info --display-info --display-
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:35:55AM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.1-2
> of my package "ampache".
>
> As explained in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/10/msg00297.html
> the mentioned
> file have been patched to use
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.1-2
of my package "ampache".
As explained in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/10/msg00297.html the
mentioned
file have been patched to use mysql_real_escape_string(). This corrects a
possible
SQL injection vulnerability.
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:15, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.1-1
> of my package "ampache". This is a new upstream maintenance
> release which partially fixes a RC bug.
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> ampache - we
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.1-1
of my package "ampache". This is a new upstream maintenance
release which partially fixes a RC bug.
It builds these binary packages:
ampache- web-based audio file management system
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5+svn2078-1
of my package "ampache".
I have contacted my usual sponsor and he is unable to sponsor
ampache at this time due to other commitments. Here is a
summary of some of the new features.
- Video Streaming Support
-
30 matches
Mail list logo
