On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:08:43PM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:14:54AM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ben Finney > > > > <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Please join me in public embarrassment of those who write changelog > > > > > entries saying “make Lintian happy”, etc. > > > > > > > > > > Lintian is not a deity to be appeased; it's a tool reporting that the > > > > > package might need fixing for explicit *reasons*, formulated by fellow > > > > > developers. The changelog entry for the fix should not even mention > > > > > Lintian and should speak only to the reason given for the check. > > > > > > > > Sounds like a target for a new lintian check ;) > > > > > > > > We are getting off-topic now, my apologies for starting that with my > > > > initial mail. > > > > > > > > > > If the discussion of lintian is finished would someone please sponsor > > > ampache-themes (Hauke) > > > > I hope you meant that *way* less sarcastic then it sounded to me... > > > No sarcasm or disrespect intended, I actually thought I was being > respectful, and polite waiting for the discussion of lintian (which I > found very helpful) to be over before I requested sponsoring of > ampache-themes. My apologies if you were offended.
Blame my not being an english native speaker. :) Hauke
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
