package gtklp
merge 170025 239509
thanks
-
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:14:19AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > 170025 should be merged[1] with 239509.
>
Got the bugs merged ;)
> Looks good. - I'll sponsor it (waiting for your final go and a little
> bit of free time on my side.).
>
package gtklp
merge 170025 239509
thanks
-
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:14:19AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > 170025 should be merged[1] with 239509.
>
Got the bugs merged ;)
> Looks good. - I'll sponsor it (waiting for your final go and a little
> bit of free time on my side.).
>
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:08:57PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> A significant percentage of d-ds, including myself is not fond of
> this kind of changelog entries. The changelog should document changes
> and not simply be used as bug-closer.
>
> 170025 should be merged[1] with 239509.
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:08:57PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> A significant percentage of d-ds, including myself is not fond of
> this kind of changelog entries. The changelog should document changes
> and not simply be used as bug-closer.
>
> 170025 should be merged[1] with 239509.
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:22:50PM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
[...]
>* New upstream version, merged patches in 0.9p-1 to upstream source
> (Closes:
> #153779, #170642, #226839)
[...]
>* More bug fixes (Closes: #170025, #174518, #177478)
[...]
Hello,
A significant percentage of d-ds, i
Hello,
I've just uploaded gtklp_0.9s-1 at
http://zakame.spunge.org/pub/debian/gtklp/ . It promises lots of bug
fixes, a GTK2 interface, and gnutls10 support. Again, I ask for a more
input regarding the packaging, additional bugfixes, and other items of
interest.
Here's the signed changes file for
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:22:50PM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
[...]
>* New upstream version, merged patches in 0.9p-1 to upstream source (Closes:
> #153779, #170642, #226839)
[...]
>* More bug fixes (Closes: #170025, #174518, #177478)
[...]
Hello,
A significant percentage of d-ds, incl
Hello,
I've just uploaded gtklp_0.9s-1 at
http://zakame.spunge.org/pub/debian/gtklp/ . It promises lots of bug
fixes, a GTK2 interface, and gnutls10 support. Again, I ask for a more
input regarding the packaging, additional bugfixes, and other items of
interest.
Here's the signed changes file for
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:42:08AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> Which has happened 6 hours ago.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/05/msg01548.html - You'll
> need to build-depend on the new package, though:
>
> Build-Depends: libcupsys2-dev (>=1.1.20final+cvs20040330-4)
>
Yep, ac
Hi!
I'll show the wholte page tomorrow, no time now, but the bug below is no
real bug.
The config file of gtklp has changed, so the "1" as command was another
flag.
If you delete the .gtklp/gtklpr or change the gtklpq-command, all works
fine.
I *should* check for config-file versions, but I
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:42:08AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> Which has happened 6 hours ago.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/05/msg01548.html - You'll
> need to build-depend on the new package, though:
>
> Build-Depends: libcupsys2-dev (>=1.1.20final+cvs20040330-4)
>
Yep, ac
Hi!
I'll show the wholte page tomorrow, no time now, but the bug below is no
real bug.
The config file of gtklp has changed, so the "1" as command was another
flag.
If you delete the .gtklp/gtklpr or change the gtklpq-command, all works
fine.
I *should* check for config-file versions, but I don
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:34:19AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> This does not work. You cannot upload a package which links and
> buidld-depends on a library in experimental to unstable. It will FTBFS
> ("fail to build from source") on every autobuilder, because they do
> not access experimen
On 2004-05-25 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-05-24 "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > gtklp (0.9s-1) unstable; urgency=low
> [...]
> > * Rebuilt gtklp against libcupsys2-gnutls10 in experimental (Closes:
> > #249494)
[...]
> You can upload gtklp to expe
On 2004-05-24 "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> gtklp (0.9s-1) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
> * Rebuilt gtklp against libcupsys2-gnutls10 in experimental (Closes:
> #249494)
This does not work. You cannot upload a package which links and
buidld-depends on a library in experimen
Hi! debian/rules!
Let me refer you to the Debian Bugs Page, at http://bugs.debian.org.
Currently there are 11 bugs that should be addressed; actually they
should have been closed/fixed years ago (thanks to the old maintainer :)
Of Particular Interest is #157399 which add a button to launch gtklpq
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:34:19AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> This does not work. You cannot upload a package which links and
> buidld-depends on a library in experimental to unstable. It will FTBFS
> ("fail to build from source") on every autobuilder, because they do
> not access experimen
On 2004-05-25 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-05-24 "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > gtklp (0.9s-1) unstable; urgency=low
> [...]
> > * Rebuilt gtklp against libcupsys2-gnutls10 in experimental (Closes:
> > #249494)
[...]
> You can upload gtklp to expe
On 2004-05-24 "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> gtklp (0.9s-1) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
> * Rebuilt gtklp against libcupsys2-gnutls10 in experimental (Closes:
> #249494)
This does not work. You cannot upload a package which links and
buidld-depends on a library in experimen
Hi! debian/rules!
Let me refer you to the Debian Bugs Page, at http://bugs.debian.org.
Currently there are 11 bugs that should be addressed; actually they
should have been closed/fixed years ago (thanks to the old maintainer :)
Of Particular Interest is #157399 which add a button to launch gtklpq
20 matches
Mail list logo
