On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:23:48PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> Does this mean that I have convinced you as to the merits of this
> proposal (ie. using WNPP for sponsorship requests)?
Not necessarily, but I don't have time to get into an argument about it.
:) My feelings are mostly grounded in aest
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:23:48PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> Does this mean that I have convinced you as to the merits of this
> proposal (ie. using WNPP for sponsorship requests)?
Not necessarily, but I don't have time to get into an argument about it.
:) My feelings are mostly grounded in aest
Colin,
Does this mean that I have convinced you as to the merits of this
proposal (ie. using WNPP for sponsorship requests)?
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:30:28PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > 3) Time-to-market: I believe the BTS-admins can implement this (better)
> > solution in a more expedient
Colin,
Does this mean that I have convinced you as to the merits of this
proposal (ie. using WNPP for sponsorship requests)?
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:30:28PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > 3) Time-to-market: I believe the BTS-admins can implement this (better)
> > solution in a more expedient
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:30:28PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> 3) Time-to-market: I believe the BTS-admins can implement this (better)
> solution in a more expedient manner, than the nm people can decide on
> what to do and how to do it (let alone implementing).
FWIW, the BTS admins have no stake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Colin,
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:04:35PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > I just had a brainstorm about the sponsorship process that I wanted to
> > share for comment.
> >
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> >
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:30:28PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> 3) Time-to-market: I believe the BTS-admins can implement this (better)
> solution in a more expedient manner, than the nm people can decide on
> what to do and how to do it (let alone implementing).
FWIW, the BTS admins have no stake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Colin,
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:04:35PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > I just had a brainstorm about the sponsorship process that I wanted to
> > share for comment.
> >
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> >
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:59:35PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > > > For Sponsorship?
> > > > > Comments?
> [...]
> > Anyone el
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > > For Sponsorship?
> > > > Comments?
[...]
> Anyone else have anything to say? Should I cc -policy and let them
> debate it?
shou
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:04:35PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> I just had a brainstorm about the sponsorship process that I wanted to
> share for comment.
>
> What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> For Sponsorship?
This has come up before. I'm told, though, that the
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:59:35PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > > > For Sponsorship?
> > > > > Comments?
> [...]
> > Anyone el
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > > For Sponsorship?
> > > > Comments?
[...]
> Anyone else have anything to say? Should I cc -policy and let them
> debate it?
shou
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:04:35PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> I just had a brainstorm about the sponsorship process that I wanted to
> share for comment.
>
> What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> For Sponsorship?
This has come up before. I'm told, though, that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > For Sponsorship?
> > > Comments?
> >
> > AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > For Sponsorship?
> > > Comments?
> >
> > AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > For Sponsorship?
> > Comments?
>
> AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also
> include ITA
in this case, the ITA
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > For Sponsorship?
> > Comments?
>
> AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also
> include ITA
in this case, the ITA
Joe Nahmias wrote:
> What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> For Sponsorship?
> Comments?
AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also include ITA and
possibly RF-yet-another-S for packages already in the archive in case a previous
sponsor lacks tim
Joe Nahmias wrote:
> What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> For Sponsorship?
> Comments?
AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also include ITA and
possibly RF-yet-another-S for packages already in the archive in case a previous
sponsor lacks tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian,
I just had a brainstorm about the sponsorship process that I wanted to
share for comment.
What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
For Sponsorship?
This way, when a non-DD is finished their packaging, you jus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian,
I just had a brainstorm about the sponsorship process that I wanted to
share for comment.
What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
For Sponsorship?
This way, when a non-DD is finished their packaging, you jus
22 matches
Mail list logo
