On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:23:48PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote: > Does this mean that I have convinced you as to the merits of this > proposal (ie. using WNPP for sponsorship requests)?
Not necessarily, but I don't have time to get into an argument about it. :) My feelings are mostly grounded in aesthetic concerns anyway, and if we come up with a better solution later there's nothing to stop us migrating to it. You should review bug #151949 and the discussions on -mentors and -newmaint around that time. > > FWIW, the BTS admins have no stake in this. wnpp is just another > > pseudo-package as far as we're concerned. I think the implementation of > > any changes there is up to debian-www. > > Okay, point taken. Maybe I should repost the proposal on > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and gauge the reaction there... While we're on the > topic, who would need to be asked to modify the wnpp emails to include > the RFS category? the list-admins? Marcelo Magallon maintains that (so probably should be asked about the web implementation too). -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
