Re: Optional cryptography

1999-06-12 Thread Chris Leishman
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 11:52:24AM -0700, Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Mitch Blevins wrote: > > > In foo.debian-mentors, you wrote: > > > Why should we need to have two differing copies? Everyone can download > > > from non-US servers - they just can't be hosted in the US. (

Re: Optional cryptography

1999-06-02 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 05:04:41PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Or can we upload a non-US package to master's dinstall, which would > then forward it to its pandora counterpart? I think not, but it'd be > a nice feature to have. >From the point of view of crypto code, this would be *extremely* b

Re: Optional cryptography

1999-06-01 Thread Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Mitch Blevins wrote: > In foo.debian-mentors, you wrote: > > Why should we need to have two differing copies? Everyone can download > > from non-US servers - they just can't be hosted in the US. (IMHO main > > is only in 'US' servers because the majority of developers are in

Re: Optional cryptography

1999-06-01 Thread Mitch Blevins
In foo.debian-mentors, you wrote: > Why should we need to have two differing copies? Everyone can download > from non-US servers - they just can't be hosted in the US. (IMHO main > is only in 'US' servers because the majority of developers are in the US). I believe the bandwidth is cheaper in th

Re: Optional cryptography

1999-06-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 12:33:53AM +1000, Chris Leishman wrote: > > > So my question is, should I provide a non-crypto enabled version, and > > > if so, do I need to have seperate source packages? > > > > Two sources are definitely needed, however, I don't know whether we > > actually need to chan

Re: Optional cryptography

1999-06-01 Thread Chris Leishman
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 03:56:18PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > > So my question is, should I provide a non-crypto enabled version, and > > if so, do I need to have seperate source packages? > > Two sources are definitely needed, however, I don't know whether we > actually need to change the

Re: Optional cryptography

1999-05-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 02:30:16PM +0100, Chris Butler wrote: > A program I'm currently thinking of packaging (nessus, a network > administration tool similar to SATAN) You shouldn't :) Javier Pena and me are already interested in it, and we almost have the package ready. It is possible that Javi

Optional cryptography

1999-05-29 Thread Chris Butler
Hi, A program I'm currently thinking of packaging (nessus, a network administration tool similar to SATAN) has optional support for cryptography which would put the client and server programs into non-US. However, since this support is optional, should I also provide a non-crypto enabled versi