On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> The problem i see is that they don't want it to become non-free, and i think
> this is ok for this package, altough i think that ocaml could be more used if
> it would become really non-free. lets start a discution with them about it,
> but
> keep in mind
On Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 08:45:10PM +0100, Fernando Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Kristoffer Rose wrote:
>
> > This is a good idea but you should of course contact the maintainer of the
> > existing OCAML package, version 1.05-2, before going further! It is
> > Christophe Le Bars <[EMAIL P
On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Kristoffer Rose wrote:
> This is a good idea but you should of course contact the maintainer of the
> existing OCAML package, version 1.05-2, before going further! It is
> Christophe Le Bars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Allow some weeks for the reply.
I've already contacted him and
Dear Sven and Fernando,
You have both expressed an interest in packaging a more recent version of
OCAML than the one that is presently in Debian.
This is a good idea but you should of course contact the maintainer of the
existing OCAML package, version 1.05-2, before going further! It is
Christo
4 matches
Mail list logo
