On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Sven LUTHER wrote: > The problem i see is that they don't want it to become non-free, and i think > this is ok for this package, altough i think that ocaml could be more used if > it would become really non-free. lets start a discution with them about it, > but > keep in mind that the opinion on releasing programs non-free is ok as long as
Ok. As I told you yesterday I can't speak much too French, but please keep me informed about it. > Ok, Fernando, which one of us package it then ? I am already debian > developper, > so the package could go in nextly. i will also package mlgtk, an ocaml binding > to gtk+, but it is still a bit alpha software. Right now i am not maintaining I really think it will be better if you do the job; you are more experienced than I am, and of course it is the presence of better packages what matters, not who maintains them, isn't it? Please go on and package ocaml. Just a comment about ocaml package, is there any problem for making a separate ocaml-doc new package? Documentation is quite big and I think it would be a good idea given that basic usage etc does not differ from one version to another. > any other packages, and i am writhing my phd thesis on camlous stuff, so i > will > need quite recent packages of it ... I use it at my faculty too so it will be nice to have newer versions as soon as possible, it's definitevely a good idea for you to maintain it. Regards, Fernando Sanchez
