I just changed the install command in the rules file and it works nicely
now... thanks :).
Martin Kelly
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Martin!
On 10/21/06, Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a package called pyecm where the upstream distributes a pyecm.py
file but in Debian I'd
On Sunday, October 22, 2006 3:34 am, Martin Kelly wrote:
> I have a question about modifying the upstream source of a package
> for debianization.
>
options mentioned deleted.
> Which of these should I do in order to comply with standards and
> good practice?
>
There are also the dpatc
Hi Martin!
On 10/21/06, Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a package called pyecm where the upstream distributes a pyecm.py
file but in Debian I'd like it to be called pyecm as that's a much
better command name (it's being used as a shell script and not a module).
If pyecm will be
I have a question about modifying the upstream source of a package for
debianization.
I have a package called pyecm where the upstream distributes a pyecm.py
file but in Debian I'd like it to be called pyecm as that's a much
better command name (it's being used as a shell script and not a modu
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 07:46:58AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2006-01-21 13:44:28, schrieb Russ Allbery:
>
> > The error message isn't about its presence in the source package but
> > rather its presence in the generated binary package. In general, in
> > Debian, you should never install
Am 2006-01-21 13:44:28, schrieb Russ Allbery:
> The error message isn't about its presence in the source package but
> rather its presence in the generated binary package. In general, in
> Debian, you should never install additional copies of the GPL, the LGPL,
> or other common licenses; instead
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 13:15 -0800, Cameron Dale wrote:
> W: torrentflux: extra-license-file var/www/torrentflux/adodb/license.txt
Other people have pointed out the solution to this, however, it
indicates to me that torrentflux includes a copy of adodb. Please don't
install that copy, unless the t
On 1/21/06, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first four you're probably going to have to just live with unless
> upstream repackages their source better. (The first two aren't even
> really problems in my opinion; the I: level of lintian output is just
> informational and isn't someth
On 1/21/06, Stan Vasilyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just remove var/www/torrentflux/adodb/license.txt after the installation. You
> definitely want to keep this file in the source package. You can then add a
> reference to LGPL in debian/copyright like this:
>
> On Debian systems, the complete t
Cameron Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to create a new package for Debian, and I have some Lintian
> warnings that I'm not sure how to deal with. I know I could fix all of
> them by removing some files from the upstream source, but I'm not sure
> if this is justified. I read the "Be
Am Samstag, den 21.01.2006, 13:15 -0800 schrieb Cameron Dale:
> I'm trying to create a new package for Debian, and I have some Lintian
> warnings that I'm not sure how to deal with. [..]
>
> W: torrentflux: extra-license-file var/www/torrentflux/adodb/license.txt
>
> The first 4 are easily fixed
On Saturday 21 January 2006 01:15 pm, Cameron Dale wrote:
>
> The first 4 are easily fixed by removing the files. The last one is a
> little more problematic, but I asked on debian-legal, and as the
> license file is for the LGPL, then the package can redistribute it
> under the GPL, and I think th
I'm trying to create a new package for Debian, and I have some Lintian
warnings that I'm not sure how to deal with. I know I could fix all of
them by removing some files from the upstream source, but I'm not sure
if this is justified. I read the "Best Packaging Practices" section of
the Developer's
13 matches
Mail list logo
