Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 01:17:28AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:26:48 +, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> > > And I've got another question. Is there a way of handling "listen ports
> > > conflicts" in debian.
> >
> > O
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 01:17:28AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:26:48 +, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> > > And I've got another question. Is there a way of handling "listen ports
> > > conflicts" in debian.
> >
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 01:17:28AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > Of course there is. It's called "register your port with the maintainer of
> > the /etc/services file".
>
> ...who is Anthony Towns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) the maintainer of netbase. But
> this is really only for "well-known ports"
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:26:48 +, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> > And I've got another question. Is there a way of handling "listen ports
> > conflicts" in debian.
>
> Of course there is. It's called "register your port with the maintainer of
> t
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> And I've got another question. Is there a way of handling "listen ports
> conflicts" in debian.
yeah it's called finders-keepers. 1 is mine all mine :-)
> I think no. So if the user want to use zabbix and
> webmin which also uses tcp 1 ... h
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 03:31:32PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:26:48 +, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> > And I've got another question. Is there a way of handling "listen ports
> > conflicts" in debian.
>
> Of course there is. It's called "register your port wit
Hi,
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:26:48 +, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> And I've got another question. Is there a way of handling "listen ports
> conflicts" in debian.
Of course there is. It's called "register your port with the maintainer of
the /etc/services file".
--
Matthias
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 09:37:27AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
> > No real problem for daemon mode, but what to do with inetd mode, as
> > defaults ports are 1 and 10001. Could I do directly:
> > update-inetd --add '1 stream tcp nowait...' o
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> No real problem for daemon mode, but what to do with inetd mode, as
> defaults ports are 1 and 10001. Could I do directly:
> update-inetd --add '1 stream tcp nowait...' or should I need to
> register the port in /etc/services (and how???), rega
Hi,
I don't know how to handle this. I'm building a debian package for zabbix
(zabbix.sourceforge.net), which could run his tcp servers processes as
daemons or as inetd.
No real problem for daemon mode, but what to do with inetd mode, as
defaults ports are 1 and 10001. Could I do directly:
up
10 matches
Mail list logo