In Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:01:19 +0200 Eduard cum veritate scripsit :
> I guess too, but the foo-i686 would cause Grave-Bugs soon. But there is
> another issue: I considered to create a special optimisation branches
> for specific CPU types using the following concept:
>
> - Packages are recompiled w
In Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:01:19 +0200 Eduard cum veritate scripsit :
> I guess too, but the foo-i686 would cause Grave-Bugs soon. But there is
> another issue: I considered to create a special optimisation branches
> for specific CPU types using the following concept:
>
> - Packages are recompiled
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:38:35PM +0200, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
> Hi Eduard
> I guess he wants to build a
> foo
> package and a
> foo-i686
> package as it was done with libc6 some time ago.
Yes, you're right.
> Viral, you need to build the whole package twice but this can be
> done using
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:38:35PM +0200, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
> Hi Eduard
> I guess he wants to build a
> foo
> package and a
> foo-i686
> package as it was done with libc6 some time ago.
Yes, you're right.
> Viral, you need to build the whole package twice but this can be
> done using
#include
Philipp Frauenfelder wrote on Tue Aug 21, 2001 um 01:38:35PM:
> I guess he wants to build a
> foo
> package and a
> foo-i686
> package as it was done with libc6 some time ago.
I guess too, but the foo-i686 would cause Grave-Bugs soon. But there is
another issue: I considered to create a
Hi Eduard
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Viral wrote on Tue Aug 21, 2001 um 02:29:25PM:
>
> > I need to build an i386 version of a package, and also an i686 optimised
> > version for the same package. Is it possible to build both packages from
> > one source, ins
#include
Viral wrote on Tue Aug 21, 2001 um 02:29:25PM:
> I need to build an i386 version of a package, and also an i686 optimised
> version for the same package. Is it possible to build both packages from
> one source, instead of doing it twice in two different directories ?
Please don't do th
#include
Philipp Frauenfelder wrote on Tue Aug 21, 2001 um 01:38:35PM:
> I guess he wants to build a
> foo
> package and a
> foo-i686
> package as it was done with libc6 some time ago.
I guess too, but the foo-i686 would cause Grave-Bugs soon. But there is
another issue: I considered to create
Hi Eduard
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Viral wrote on Tue Aug 21, 2001 um 02:29:25PM:
>
> > I need to build an i386 version of a package, and also an i686 optimised
> > version for the same package. Is it possible to build both packages from
> > one source, in
#include
Viral wrote on Tue Aug 21, 2001 um 02:29:25PM:
> I need to build an i386 version of a package, and also an i686 optimised
> version for the same package. Is it possible to build both packages from
> one source, instead of doing it twice in two different directories ?
Please don't do t
Hi,
I need to build an i386 version of a package, and also an i686 optimised
version for the same package. Is it possible to build both packages from
one source, instead of doing it twice in two different directories ?
viral
--
http://www.infofin.com/~gandalf
"Live for today, gone tomorrow, t
Hi,
I need to build an i386 version of a package, and also an i686 optimised
version for the same package. Is it possible to build both packages from
one source, instead of doing it twice in two different directories ?
viral
--
http://www.infofin.com/~gandalf
"Live for today, gone tomorrow,
12 matches
Mail list logo
