On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:08:43PM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:14:54AM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, B
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:14:54AM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ben Finney
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please join me in public embarrassme
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:14:54AM -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ben Finney
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please join me in public embarrassment of those who write changelog
> > > entries saying “make Lintian ha
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ben Finney
> wrote:
>
> > Please join me in public embarrassment of those who write changelog
> > entries saying “make Lintian happy”, etc.
> >
> > Lintian is not a deity to be appeased; it's a tool reporting
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Please join me in public embarrassment of those who write changelog
> entries saying “make Lintian happy”, etc.
>
> Lintian is not a deity to be appeased; it's a tool reporting that the
> package might need fixing for explicit *reasons*, formul
Jan Hauke Rahm writes:
> Hi Manoj,
>
> I'm not going to argue with you about this.
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 04:12:21AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > There is a time and a place where these lintian options are
> > useful. They certainly have a place, and are recommended for
> > e
6 matches
Mail list logo
