Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After some days of playing around and talking upstream i've come to the
> conclusion that
> - i would want to downgrade that bug anyhow and
> - keep up policy violation at least for another release + fixes.
No need to downgrade, I think. Just tag it
Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After some days of playing around and talking upstream i've come to the
> conclusion that
> - i would want to downgrade that bug anyhow and
> - keep up policy violation at least for another release + fixes.
No need to downgrade, I think. Just tag it
(Crossposted d-devel intentionally. Replies to d-mentors only, please).
GGI project released GGI 2.0. Debian is going woody. I would like to
have a clean GGI in woody, but trouble with bugs and policy.
Libgii and libggi, the DYNAMIC duo, lived, more or less happily, for a
long time without any
(Crossposted d-devel intentionally. Replies to d-mentors only, please).
GGI project released GGI 2.0. Debian is going woody. I would like to
have a clean GGI in woody, but trouble with bugs and policy.
Libgii and libggi, the DYNAMIC duo, lived, more or less happily, for a
long time without an
4 matches
Mail list logo
