Re: Help with RC bugs

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 05:59:09PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > > SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a > > *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2 > > support is g

Re: Help with RC bugs

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 05:59:09PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > > SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a > > *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2 > > support is g

Re: Help with RC bugs

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a > *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2 > support is gone for the panel and applets in unstable, should I just > stop uploadin

Re: Help with RC bugs

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a > *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2 > support is gone for the panel and applets in unstable, should I just > stop uploadin

Help with RC bugs

Hi I'm having some problems with two RC bugs in my packages, I'd like to see if any mentor can help me out... FIRST (#184121): is it OK to declare an explicit dependency on libsigc++-dev if my dev package includes files from it? (I'm guessing it is, by documentation, but something doesn't look ri

Help with RC bugs

Hi I'm having some problems with two RC bugs in my packages, I'd like to see if any mentor can help me out... FIRST (#184121): is it OK to declare an explicit dependency on libsigc++-dev if my dev package includes files from it? (I'm guessing it is, by documentation, but something doesn't look ri