Re: GBP and moving to a new upstream release...

2015-04-09 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 05:47:51PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Thursday 09 April 2015 09:21:24 Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > I've been following the steps as best I can here [1] to upgrade my > > package (qpid-proton) to the latest upstream release (0.9). However, > > these steps result in a

Re: GBP and moving to a new upstream release...

2015-04-09 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:47:51 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > What is the right way to go about this? > First, fix your git repo before attempting an import: > - watch file is broken > - several files have git merge artifacts (try a «ack '<<<'» in your repo) > - upstream and pristine-tar branche

Re: GBP and moving to a new upstream release...

2015-04-09 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday 09 April 2015 09:21:24 Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > I've been following the steps as best I can here [1] to upgrade my > package (qpid-proton) to the latest upstream release (0.9). However, > these steps result in a merge commit (actually, they result in a huge > set of conflicts) and that

GBP and moving to a new upstream release...

2015-04-09 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
I've been following the steps as best I can here [1] to upgrade my package (qpid-proton) to the latest upstream release (0.9). However, these steps result in a merge commit (actually, they result in a huge set of conflicts) and that strikes me as a Bad Thing (tm). Why does GBP try to merge, rather