On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0700, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> it looks like there is a RFP for mozilla-calendar and i don't
> see any packages for thunderbird (mozilla mail) or RFP for it
> i wanted to start being useful and start packaging some things
> i use
> i use both of those, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tried reaching someone in #debian-mentors on freenode w/o luck, so I
am posting here.
- --
it looks like there is a RFP for mozilla-calendar and i don't
see any packages for thunderbird (mozilla mail) or RFP for it
i wanted to start bei
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0700, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> it looks like there is a RFP for mozilla-calendar and i don't
> see any packages for thunderbird (mozilla mail) or RFP for it
> i wanted to start being useful and start packaging some things
> i use
> i use both of those, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tried reaching someone in #debian-mentors on freenode w/o luck, so I
am posting here.
- --
it looks like there is a RFP for mozilla-calendar and i don't
see any packages for thunderbird (mozilla mail) or RFP for it
i wanted to start being
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:00:30AM +1100, Michael Still wrote:
> I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
> but the web pages I have been reading imply that it is a bad thing to
> attempt a library as a first package. Unfortunately most of my code
> depends on librar
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Michael Still wrote:
> I have been an open source developer for some time, and am now an
> experienced Debian user (a whole week under my belt!).
Heh.
> I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
> but the web pages I have been reading imply that
Hey,
I have been an open source developer for some time, and am now an
experienced Debian user (a whole week under my belt!).
I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
but the web pages I have been reading imply that it is a bad thing to
attempt a library as a firs
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:00:30AM +1100, Michael Still wrote:
> I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
> but the web pages I have been reading imply that it is a bad thing to
> attempt a library as a first package. Unfortunately most of my code
> depends on librar
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Michael Still wrote:
> I have been an open source developer for some time, and am now an
> experienced Debian user (a whole week under my belt!).
Heh.
> I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
> but the web pages I have been reading imply that
Hey,
I have been an open source developer for some time, and am now an
experienced Debian user (a whole week under my belt!).
I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
but the web pages I have been reading imply that it is a bad thing to
attempt a library as a firs
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
> The .orig tarballs should be as found on the original distribution site,
> so people can check the original signatures (also I know several people
> who build software on NetBSD and Solaris from the .orig.tar.gzs they find
> at debian.org).
Yes, I k
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:16:06AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > dpkg-source: building libio-stty-perl in libio-stty-perl_0.02-1.diff.gz
> > shell-init: could not get current directory: No such file or directory
>
> Hrm, these are caused by directories being deleted while someone is cd'ed
> to i
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
> Okay, I've found only one last thing: The perl modules in libio-stty are
> chmod +x, while the module in libexpect is not. Other than that, the
> packages seem to be fine.
I have fixed that now, added '-m 0644' to the install command.
Did the same wi
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
> > libio-stty-perl is corrected, libexpect-perl not. You should do that as
> > well (look at the .diff.gz files with diffstat).
> Hmm, I could only see a few unused example files in the debian directory.
> Was it them you meant?
No, libexpect-perl was s
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
> The .orig tarballs should be as found on the original distribution site,
> so people can check the original signatures (also I know several people
> who build software on NetBSD and Solaris from the .orig.tar.gzs they find
> at debian.org).
Yes, I
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:16:06AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > dpkg-source: building libio-stty-perl in libio-stty-perl_0.02-1.diff.gz
> > shell-init: could not get current directory: No such file or directory
>
> Hrm, these are caused by directories being deleted while someone is cd'ed
> to
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
> Okay, I've found only one last thing: The perl modules in libio-stty are
> chmod +x, while the module in libexpect is not. Other than that, the
> packages seem to be fine.
I have fixed that now, added '-m 0644' to the install command.
Did the same w
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
> > libio-stty-perl is corrected, libexpect-perl not. You should do that as
> > well (look at the .diff.gz files with diffstat).
> Hmm, I could only see a few unused example files in the debian directory.
> Was it them you meant?
No, libexpect-perl was
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
>> > You haven't corrected the clean rules yet, so the diff.gz still contains
>> > loads of unnecessary stuff.
>
>> Ok, done, couldn't see any errors.
>
> libio-stty-perl is corrected, libexpect-perl not. You should do that as
> well (look at the .di
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
>> > You haven't corrected the clean rules yet, so the diff.gz still contains
>> > loads of unnecessary stuff.
>
>> Ok, done, couldn't see any errors.
>
> libio-stty-perl is corrected, libexpect-perl not. You should do that as
> well (look at the .d
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
> > You haven't corrected the clean rules yet, so the diff.gz still contains
> > loads of unnecessary stuff.
> Ok, done, couldn't see any errors.
libio-stty-perl is corrected, libexpect-perl not. You should do that as
well (look at the .diff.gz files wit
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
> > You haven't corrected the clean rules yet, so the diff.gz still contains
> > loads of unnecessary stuff.
> Ok, done, couldn't see any errors.
libio-stty-perl is corrected, libexpect-perl not. You should do that as
well (look at the .diff.gz files wi
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
>
>> ftp.axis.se:/pub/users/jh now contain all the files generated by
>> dpkg-buildpackage, if you would be so kind to check them I would be happy.
>
> You haven't corrected the clean rules yet, so the diff.gz still contains
> loads of unnecessary st
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
>
>> ftp.axis.se:/pub/users/jh now contain all the files generated by
>> dpkg-buildpackage, if you would be so kind to check them I would be happy.
>
> You haven't corrected the clean rules yet, so the diff.gz still contains
> loads of unnecessary s
> First of all, we should copy debian-mentors again. I forgot that on my
> last mail. Is that okay with you?
Ok, I wasn't shure of the normal procedures.
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
>> milamber{jh}55 dpkg-source -b libio-stty-perl-0.02
>> dpkg-source: building libio-stty-perl u
> First of all, we should copy debian-mentors again. I forgot that on my
> last mail. Is that okay with you?
Ok, I wasn't shure of the normal procedures.
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
>> milamber{jh}55 dpkg-source -b libio-stty-perl-0.02
>> dpkg-source: building libio-stty-perl
Hi,
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> Le Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 02:10:18PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava écrivait:
Raphael> Hi,
>> Should configuration not go under /etc/sympa/? I note th you
>> do have /etc/sympa.conf; are trhewse configuration files supposed to
>>
Hi,
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> Why not, but why does debstd provide the possibilitry of modifying :
Raphael> It seems to me unlogical since debstd should help the
Raphael> developers to follow the Debian Po`qlicy... Should we
Raphael> consider that de
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Why not, but why does debstd provide the possibilitry of modifying :
> - /etc/aliases
> - /etc/syslog.conf
> - /etc/inetd.conf
> - /etc/services
> - /etc/inittab
> - /etc/protocols
> - /etc/profile
> - /etc/modules
> - /etc/X11/window-managers
> - probably some others
>
>
Le Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 02:10:18PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava écrivait:
Hi,
> Should configuration not go under /etc/sympa/? I note th you
> do have /etc/sympa.conf; are trhewse configuration files supposed to
> be edited by the user? If yes, then they should go under /etc; if
> not, then m
Le Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 02:38:26PM -0400, Stephen J. Carpenter écrivait:
> If you need this on...maybe you should work out some scheme with the
> sysklogd maintainer. Eiether have you changes in by default or
> add some way you can "turn it on" (ie by the existance of a file or
> some such)
Can be
Hi,
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> - I don't know if I follow FSSTND with my packages, i've used :
Raphael> - /var/spool/sympa/* for the messages queues
Raphael> - /var/lib/sympa/* for the configuration for the lists and for the
Raphael> archives of
On Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 06:56:47PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 10:24:04AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
> > Any comments is welcome... especially about the scripts.
>
> [sympa is a mailing-list manager && libmsgcat-perl a small perl
> module who enable the use of ca
Le Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 10:24:04AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
> Any comments is welcome... especially about the scripts.
[sympa is a mailing-list manager && libmsgcat-perl a small perl
module who enable the use of catclose/catopen/catgets in perl]
Since nobody wants to look a the (binaries
Hello,
I'm happy to announce you the birth of my first packages...
You cand find them here : http://prope.insa-lyon.fr/~rhertzog/debian/
Any comments is welcome... especially about the scripts.
Thanks.
PS: the sympa package depends on libmsgcat
--
Hertzog Raphaël -+- [EMAIL PROT
Hi Guys!
I've put my packages back together without debmake helper scripts, and
I feel much more confidant now that I know what is going on. A big
help was Igor Grobman's unfinished work, the "Debian Programmers
Manual"
http://www.pics.com/~igor/debian/programmer.html/index.html
which contain
> I think that I will be able to manage the rules file (doing by
> example, as Manoj said), but what I am missing is a feeling of what
> utilities get run in what order. For instance, is dpkg-buildpackage
> just another helper script, or is it something that all but the most
> ardent do-it-your-se
Hi,
>>"Kirk" == Kirk Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kirk> Thanks Manoj, Scott, and Igor for answering my questions. Manoj,
Kirk> if you have that "Working set of rules files as a learning
Kirk> example" available, then yes, I would like a copy. You
Kirk> mentioning mailing it. That would b
Thanks Manoj, Scott, and Igor for answering my questions.
Manoj, if you have that "Working set of rules files as a learning
example" available, then yes, I would like a copy. You mentioning
mailing it. That would be fine, or I could grab it off you web site
if you made it available there.
I h
Hi,
>>"Kirk" == Kirk Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kirk> 0. BTW, I built my packages in what I assume is the standard
Kirk> way. I ran deb-make, edited the files in debian/ and ran build.
Kirk> Should I be doing something differently? I am not quite
Kirk> comfortable with this level of au
On 2 Feb 1998, Kirk Hilliard wrote:
> OK, here is my first bunch of question.
>
> 0. BTW, I built my packages in what I assume is the standard way. I
>ran deb-make, edited the files in debian/ and ran build. Should I
>be doing something differently? I am not quite comfortable with
>
> I would also appreciate it if someone could give my packages a quick
> look before I upload them to Incoming. I could either put them in my
> home directory on master or in an obscure corner of my web page. Were
> I to do that and then decide that I wanted to change something, would
> I have t
Hi Mentors!
I am putting together my first two packages: elisp-manual and
emacs-lisp-intro. These are orphaned packages that I adopted and am
converting over from old source format as well as updating with
new upstream versions.
I have several minor question, the first bunch of which I will ask
43 matches
Mail list logo
